Below are the logos Stamatis kindly collected on his branch. Since there are only six, perhaps we can just proceed with a vote? Although I'm fine if we want to go through the nomination process as well. I like your point Julian that we can still make final tweaks once we decide on a logo, so whatever the process is, we should keep that in mind.
https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt1-v3.svg https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt2-v3.svg https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt3-v1.svg https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt4-v4.svg https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt5-v6.svg https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt6-v7.svg -- Michael Mior [email protected] Le mar. 25 juin 2019 à 15:04, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> a écrit : > > About process. I propose the following: > > Over the next 2 days, people can nominate one logo by replying to this email > with the URL of their choice. > > Michael then starts a vote between the top 3 (or the top 2, if there are a > lot of ties for 3rd place). > > After we have decided on a logo, we can still ask the author to make final > tweaks to that logo. > > Julian > > > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 5:45 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks Stamatis! So far I think I like pretty much every alternative > > I've seen more than the current logo. I'm not sure what others think > > about process, but I'd like to close discussion and take a vote in the > > near future. > > > > -- > > Michael Mior > > [email protected] > > > > Le lun. 24 juin 2019 à 17:37, Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > >> > >> I added a couple of more alternatives under [1]. Let me know what you > >> think. > >> More suggestions are very welcome! > >> > >> Best, > >> Stamatis > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/tree/calcite-logo/site/img > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:47 AM Yuzhao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I would prefer > >>> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt2-v1.svg > >>> if the hammer can be smaller :) > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Danny Chan > >>> 在 2019年6月5日 +0800 AM8:32，Albert <[email protected]>，写道： > >>>> I will vote "logo-alt1-v5.svg > >>>> < > >>> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt1-v5.svg > >>>> " > >>>> , looks nice. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:11 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I created a branch to gather all alternative logos [1]. > >>>>> > >>>>> Among the two aforementioned proposals, I added a few more variants > >>> (check > >>>>> logo-alt* under the img directory). > >>>>> Have a look and let me know what you think. I'm open to any ideas and > >>>>> suggestions. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/tree/calcite-logo/site/img > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:25 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I prefer both over the current logo. (And I made the current logo.) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let's keep the discussion going, and get to a new logo. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Ivan Grgurina <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I prefer the one Daniel sent. It looks cleaner, but maybe the > >>> "periodic > >>>>>> table" logo can be made better by simplifying it, the shadow on the > >>>>> letter > >>>>>> C is... unusual. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>>> From: Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 6:32 PM > >>>>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Giving the Calcite logo some love > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for digging this out Daniel! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> At this point we have two candidates: > >>>>>>> http://humbedooh.com/calcite-proposed.svg > >>>>>>> https://svgshare.com/s/86r > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Do we like any of above more than our current logo (the way they > >>> are or > >>>>>>> with slight modifications) ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:15 AM Yuzhao Chen <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Oh, I see a big hammer, thanks Daniel ! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Danny Chan > >>>>>>>> 在 2019年6月3日 +0800 AM6:21，Daniel Gruno <[email protected]>，写道： > >>>>>>>>> Found it! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> http://humbedooh.com/calcite-proposed.svg > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Wayback Machine! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 19/05/2019 10.01, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> We started this discussion about a year ago and many people > >>> were > >>>>>>>>>> positive with the idea of having a new logo for Calcite. > >>>>>>>>>> We had some nice proposals at the time and maybe now somebody > >>>>> else > >>>>>> has > >>>>>>>>>> also new ideas/designs to contribute. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> @Daniel: Is there any chance that you still have the logos > >>> you > >>>>>> proposed > >>>>>>>>>> somewhere available? The old link [1] does not work anymore. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> Stamatis > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> http://www.apache.org/logos/comdev-test/res/calcite/calcite-proposed.svg > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:02 AM Stamatis Zampetakis < > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Vladimir>Could you flip rhombus so it goes right-up? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://svgshare.com/s/86r > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I hope this is what you meant. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>> Stamatis > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Στις Τετ, 29 Αυγ 2018 στις 6:30 μ.μ., ο/η Michael Mior > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> έγραψε: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Just a note since we're on the topic that whatever logos we > >>> come > >>>>>>>>>> up with > >>>>>>>>>> should be sure to have TM clearly indicated. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Michael Mior > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 29 août 2018 à 03:13, Julian Hyde > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a > >>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed! > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If someone feels inspired to produce a logo, here’s my > >>>>>>>>>> suggestion of a > >>>>>>>>>>> theme/image: a spider, specifically a Barn Spider (Araneus > >>>>>>>>>> Cavaticus)[1]. > >>>>>>>>>>> It was the origin of the name “avatica”, connects and spins > >>>>>>>>>> webs, and the > >>>>>>>>>>> eponymous individual in Charlotte’s Web had rather > >>> exceptional > >>>>>>>>>>> communication skills. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_spider > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 28, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Francis Chuang > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The designs I have seen so far look really good! Would it > >>>>>>>>>> also make > >>>>>>>>>>> sense to design a variant for Avatica as well? This is what > >>>>>>>>>> the current > >>>>>>>>>>> Avatica logo looks like: > >>>>>>>>>> https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/img/logo.png > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Francis > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/08/2018 7:08 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stamatis>How about something like the following: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There's left-to-right vs right-to-left issue, however I > >>>>>>>>>> would claim that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the direction of improvement is right+up. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance: BTC price is good when plots go to the > >>> right > >>>>>>>>>> and go > >>>>>>>>>>> upward. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svgur.com/s/83y is slanted backward. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That creates perception of "Calcite holding back the > >>>>>>>>>> progress" or > >>>>>>>>>>> "Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pushing C away" or something like that. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you flip rhombus so it goes right-up? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>>> no mistakes > >>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >>> >
