FYI: I checked the logos today on Windows and Debian and the fonts for a
couple of them (4A, 4B, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 5F) are quite messed up. Apparently
they appear as they were supposed to only on MacOS.

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:10 AM Chunwei Lei <chunwei.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I prefer the design of 5b too, but with the font of 2c.
>
> Best,
> Chunwei
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:09 AM Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Top 2 in descending order:
> > 1) 2C - for simple and elegant icon
> > 2) 4D- for its nice color and font
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2019年6月26日 +0800 AM6:16,Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>,写道:
> > > Here is the updated link with the candidate logos:
> > > https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/index.md
> > >
> > > Let's follow Julian's suggestion and start the nomination process for
> the
> > > next 48 hours.
> > >
> > > Personally, the ones that I like the most are:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/index.md#candidate-5b
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/index.md#candidate-5e
> > >
> > > They are exactly the same just with different colours which makes sense
> > if
> > > we want to use them in different places:
> > > 5b would look nice in presentations while 5e would fit well with the
> > > existing colors of our website.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:48 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, feel free to add the others to index.md (cherry-pick my changes
> > > > back to your branch).
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabe...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually there are more than six since "v" stands for variant
> rather
> > than
> > > > > version.
> > > > > I think it is worth including the rest since in various cases some
> > of the
> > > > > final variants did not end-up so well.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:26 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I've put those 6 logos on one page.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/index.md
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:19 PM Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Below are the logos Stamatis kindly collected on his branch.
> > Since
> > > > > > > there are only six, perhaps we can just proceed with a vote?
> > Although
> > > > > > > I'm fine if we want to go through the nomination process as
> > well. I
> > > > > > > like your point Julian that we can still make final tweaks once
> > we
> > > > > > > decide on a logo, so whatever the process is, we should keep
> > that in
> > > > > > > mind.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt1-v3.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt2-v3.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt3-v1.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt4-v4.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt5-v6.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt6-v7.svg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Michael Mior
> > > > > > > mm...@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le mar. 25 juin 2019 à 15:04, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> a
> > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > About process. I propose the following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Over the next 2 days, people can nominate one logo by
> replying
> > to
> > > > this
> > > > > > email with the URL of their choice.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael then starts a vote between the top 3 (or the top 2,
> if
> > > > there
> > > > > > are a lot of ties for 3rd place).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > After we have decided on a logo, we can still ask the author
> to
> > > > make
> > > > > > final tweaks to that logo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Julian
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 5:45 PM, Michael Mior <
> mm...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Stamatis! So far I think I like pretty much every
> > > > alternative
> > > > > > > > > I've seen more than the current logo. I'm not sure what
> > others
> > > > think
> > > > > > > > > about process, but I'd like to close discussion and take a
> > vote
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > near future.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Michael Mior
> > > > > > > > > mm...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Le lun. 24 juin 2019 à 17:37, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > > > zabe...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > a écrit :
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I added a couple of more alternatives under [1]. Let me
> > know
> > > > what
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > think.
> > > > > > > > > > More suggestions are very welcome!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/tree/calcite-logo/site/img
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:47 AM Yuzhao Chen <
> > > > yuzhao....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt2-v1.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > if the hammer can be smaller :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > > > > > > 在 2019年6月5日 +0800 AM8:32,Albert <zinki...@gmail.com
> >,写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I will vote "logo-alt1-v5.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/blob/calcite-logo/site/img/logo-alt1-v5.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > , looks nice.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:11 AM Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > > > > > zabe...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I created a branch to gather all alternative logos
> > [1].
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Among the two aforementioned proposals, I added a
> > few more
> > > > > > variants
> > > > > > > > > > > (check
> > > > > > > > > > > > > logo-alt* under the img directory).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Have a look and let me know what you think. I'm
> open
> > to any
> > > > > > ideas and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > suggestions.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > https://github.com/zabetak/calcite/tree/calcite-logo/site/img
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 7:25 PM Julian Hyde <
> > jh...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer both over the current logo. (And I made
> > the current
> > > > > > logo.)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's keep the discussion going, and get to a new
> > logo.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Ivan Grgurina <
> > > > > > ivan.grgur...@fer.hr>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer the one Daniel sent. It looks cleaner,
> > but maybe
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > "periodic
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > table" logo can be made better by simplifying it,
> > the
> > > > shadow on
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > letter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > C is... unusual.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 6:32 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org;
> humbed...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Giving the Calcite logo some love
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for digging this out Daniel!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At this point we have two candidates:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://humbedooh.com/calcite-proposed.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svgshare.com/s/86r
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we like any of above more than our current
> > logo (the way
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > are or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with slight modifications) ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:15 AM Yuzhao Chen <
> > > > > > yuzhao....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see a big hammer, thanks Daniel !
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 在 2019年6月3日 +0800 AM6:21,Daniel Gruno <
> > > > humbed...@apache.org
> > > > > > > ,写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Found it!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://humbedooh.com/calcite-proposed.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Wayback Machine!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 19/05/2019 10.01, Stamatis Zampetakis
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We started this discussion about a year
> > ago and many
> > > > people
> > > > > > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > positive with the idea of having a new
> > logo for Calcite.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We had some nice proposals at the time
> and
> > maybe now
> > > > > > somebody
> > > > > > > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also new ideas/designs to contribute.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Daniel: Is there any chance that you
> > still have the
> > > > logos
> > > > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > proposed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somewhere available? The old link [1]
> does
> > not work
> > > > anymore.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > http://www.apache.org/logos/comdev-test/res/calcite/calcite-proposed.svg
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:02 AM Stamatis
> > Zampetakis <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > zabe...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mailto:zabe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir>Could you flip rhombus so it
> goes
> > right-up?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svgshare.com/s/86r
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope this is what you meant.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stamatis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Στις Τετ, 29 Αυγ 2018 στις 6:30 μ.μ., ο/η
> > Michael Mior
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <mm...@apache.org <mailto:
> mm...@apache.org>>
> > έγραψε:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just a note since we're on the topic that
> > whatever
> > > > logos we
> > > > > > > > > > > come
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > up with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should be sure to have TM clearly
> > indicated.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Mior
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mm...@apache.org <mailto:
> mm...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 29 août 2018 à 03:13, Julian Hyde
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com <mailto:
> > jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>>
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes indeed!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If someone feels inspired to produce a
> > logo, here’s my
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggestion of a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > theme/image: a spider, specifically a
> > Barn Spider
> > > > (Araneus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cavaticus)[1].
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was the origin of the name
> “avatica”,
> > connects and
> > > > spins
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > webs, and the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eponymous individual in Charlotte’s Web
> > had rather
> > > > > > > > > > > exceptional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > communication skills.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Julian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barn_spider
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 28, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Francis
> > Chuang
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <francischu...@apache.org <mailto:
> > > > francischu...@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The designs I have seen so far look
> > really good!
> > > > Would it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also make
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sense to design a variant for Avatica
> as
> > well? This is
> > > > what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the current
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Avatica logo looks like:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://calcite.apache.org/avatica/img/logo.png
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Francis
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29/08/2018 7:08 AM, Vladimir
> > Sitnikov wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stamatis>How about something like
> > the following:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's left-to-right vs
> > right-to-left issue,
> > > > however I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would claim that
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the direction of improvement is
> > right+up.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance: BTC price is good
> when
> > plots go to the
> > > > > > > > > > > right
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and go
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upward.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svgur.com/s/83y is slanted
> > backward.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That creates perception of "Calcite
> > holding back the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > progress" or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Apache
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pushing C away" or something like
> > that.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you flip rhombus so it goes
> > right-up?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > > > > > > > > no mistakes
> > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to