+1

I’ve poked Khai Tran re. 3122 (Pig).

> On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The release is advancing quite well, yet we have 22 issues marked for
> 1.21.0 [1].
> 
> From those, the following 5 seem to be the most important:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1581
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2302
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3122
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3224
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3228
> 
> I will try to have an RC for the 26th of August so let's try to get them in.
> 
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> 
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:51 AM Danny Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Let’s get the CALCITE-2302[1]: the full implicit type cast support into
>> 1.21 !
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/706
>> 
>> Best,
>> Danny Chan
>> 在 2019年7月21日 +0800 PM3:28,Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>,写道:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> Approximately one month has passed from the previous release (Calcite
>>> 1.20.0) and I was thinking that it would be nice to have the next release
>>> out by the end of August. To do this I think we should try to have an RC
>>> around the 20 of August.
>>> 
>>> The progress towards the next release can be seen in [1]. As you can
>>> observe we do not have many issues marked for fixing for 1.21.0 but we do
>>> have many pull requests.
>>> 
>>> I would like to invite committers to go over the existing PRs and for
>> those
>>> that we plan to review and finalize in the next month or so set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0 adding an appropriate comment.
>>> 
>>> In term of priorities, I think we should emphasize on finalizing and
>>> merging PRs that are blocking other open source projects and commercial
>>> products from upgrading to the latest release. If it is not already done
>>> please assign this issues the highest priority (blocker) and set the fix
>>> version to 1.21.0.
>>> 
>>> Apart from very important issues it makes sense to treat PRs in FIFO
>> order.
>>> Contributors who submit a PR early will certainly get discouraged to
>>> contribute again if we never merge these PRs in time.
>>> 
>>> Don't hesitate to reply to this thread if the plan above is not
>> convenient
>>> for you!
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Stamatis
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>> 

Reply via email to