I think [CALCITE-3158] would be the main highlight of the next release. I really like the feeling of Gradle and the idea of the mock ASF environment.
>From my tests so far everything seems good; I would like to verify that the structure of the artifacts is good and then I think it can be merged. Should be doable for November. @Francis: How do you feel about preparing the next release via Gradle? Best, Stamatis On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 11:47 PM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks to those who have made some headway during the last week by > reviewing and merging PRs. Would early November be ample time for a rc0? > If more time is needed to review and merged the current PRs on Github, > please let me know. > > Francis > > On 11/10/2019 8:06 am, Francis Chuang wrote: > > Thanks, Josh! Very much appreciated! > > > > On 11/10/2019 2:35 am, Josh Elser wrote: > >> I'll try to get CALCITE-3384 in. > >> > >> Will take a look through the reste here. A couple catch my eye. > >> > >> On 10/9/19 7:26 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > >>> Hey everyone, > >>> > >>> It's been around 5 months since the last Avatica release. There's > >>> been a couple of commits to the code-base since and I'd like to use > >>> this as an opportunity to get a few more PRs in and make a release > >>> available for voting. I am happy to be release manager for this > release. > >>> > >>> In terms of PRs I am hoping for the following to be merged for this > >>> release: > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3384: Support Kerberos using SPNEGO over HTTPS - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/113 (Josh is reviewing) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-333: Add pluggable frame size limits - > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3333 (looking for a > >>> reviewer) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3199: Fix unixDateCeil and unixDateFloor - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/109 (looking for a > >>> reviewer) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3162: Reading arrays from Calcite through JdbcMeta throws > >>> exception - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/106 > >>> (looking for a reviewer) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3163: Mapping types in AbstractCursor does not adhere to > >>> JDBC spec - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/105 > >>> (looking for a reviewer) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3158: Move build system to Gradle - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/104 (Vladimir has put > >>> a lot of effort into this. Can we get some consensus as to whether > >>> this should to be merged?) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-3078: Duplicate code for lastDay in Calcite and Avatica - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/98 (looking for a > >>> reviewer) > >>> > >>> - No Jira: Support UNIX timestamp to string date - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/96 (can someone > >>> confirm if these changes are valid or should the PR be closed?) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-2704: Avoid using ISO-8859-1 to parse request in > >>> JSONHandler - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/85 > >>> (Someone posted some tests in the issue comments. Can someone please > >>> add the tests, review and merge?) > >>> > >>> - CALCITE-1806: Add Spark JDBC tests - > >>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/28 (Kevin, any chance > >>> you can take another look at this?) > >>> > >>> If you have some spare cycles for Avatica, please pick up some of the > >>> PRs in this list, it would be very much appreciated! > >>> > >>> Francis >
