Hi, Vladimir. The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you have free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it.
Vladimir Ozerov <ppoze...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道： > Hi, > > Could you please also merge > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck > somehow, > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a copy of > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project. > > Regards, > Vladimir > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org>: > > > Thanks Julian! > > > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then I will > > lock the main branch and start the release process. > > > > > > -Rui > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946. > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Zhe. > > > > > > > > Hi Francesco, > > > > > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look? > > > > > > > > -Rui > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <iluff...@163.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, Rui. > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it > currently. > > > >> Thanks for your work! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> ZheHu > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<francesco.g...@gmail.com> wrote： > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in review. I > > > believe > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed anything. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around > CALCITE-4898 > > > and > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses. > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked as > > resolved > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably not all > > > >> those > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -Rui > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has been > > > >> merged. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> Ruben > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Rui, > > > >> > > > >> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked > fixed, > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category X. > > > >> That > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. > > > >> > > > >> I’m working on getting > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done today. > > > >> Please > > > >> wait for that. > > > >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big > > > >> refactoring > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t going > > > >> to > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it. > > > >> > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and fix-in-1.29: > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will Noble) > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan Koo) > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> (Stamatis) > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas Rebele) > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / Duan > > > >> Xiong) > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> (Francesco > Gini) > > > >> > > > >> What’s the status on those? > > > >> > > > >> Julian > > > >> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> > > > >> > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored tradition > > > >> the > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi community, > > > >> > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check the > > > >> JIRA > > > >> list > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now remains > > > >> open/in > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be > > > >> merged. > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some fixes to > > > >> be > > > >> released. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of Calcite by > > > >> the > > > >> end > > > >> of this week. > > > >> > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions. > > > >> > > > >> [1]: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -Rui > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Francesco Gini > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
