Hi Xiong, Thank you very much.
Vladimir. Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 14:32, xiong duan <nobigo...@gmail.com>: > Hi Vladimir, > > I have merged. > > Vladimir Ozerov <ppoze...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 16:58写道： > > > Hi Xiong, > > > > I've just resolved the conflicts. > > > > Regards, > > Vladimir. > > > > сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 10:48, xiong duan <nobigo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi, Vladimir. > > > > > > The PR[https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464] looks good. If you > > > have > > > free time Please resolve the conflicts. Then we can merge it. > > > > > > Vladimir Ozerov <ppoze...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月18日周六 15:20写道： > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Could you please also merge > > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2464 ? I guess it got stuck > > > > somehow, > > > > as all the comments are addressed. This issue forced us to create a > > copy > > > of > > > > the AggregateUnionTransposeRule in our project. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Vladimir > > > > > > > > Сб, 18 дек. 2021 г. в 09:51, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Julian! > > > > > > > > > > Now we will just decide whether to merge CALCITE-4907 or not, then > I > > > will > > > > > lock the main branch and start the release process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Rui > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:29 PM Julian Hyde < > jhyde.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Rui, I have merged CALCITE-4946. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:21 PM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Zhe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Francesco, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I left a comment in your PR. Can you take a look? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Rui > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:32 PM Zhe Hu <iluff...@163.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, Rui. > > > > > > >> CALCITE-4860 will be fixed in next release, you can pass it > > > > currently. > > > > > > >> Thanks for your work! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > > >> ZheHu > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 12/18/2021 06:08，Francesco Gini<francesco.g...@gmail.com> > > > wrote： > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 is in > > review. > > > I > > > > > > believe > > > > > > >> I have addressed all the comments. Let me know if I missed > > > anything. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 22:42, Jacques Nadeau < > > jacq...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I've merged CALCITE-4948 to mitigate the concerns around > > > > CALCITE-4898 > > > > > > and > > > > > > >> maven repositories and category x licenses. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rui Wang < > amaliu...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> For the list of 1.29 fix Jira, several Jira have been marked > as > > > > > resolved > > > > > > >> since this Monday. I will do another pass today but probably > not > > > all > > > > > > >> those > > > > > > >> will make the 1.29.0 release. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -Rui > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:57 AM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hello, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 has > been > > > > > > >> merged. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > >> Ruben > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:40 PM Julian Hyde < > > > jhyde.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Rui, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Even though > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898 > > < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4898> is marked > > > > fixed, > > > > > > >> there’s some fallout regarding maven repositories and category > > X. > > > > > > >> That > > > > > > >> needs to be sorted out before RC0. See [1]. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I’m working on getting > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946 > > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4946> done > > today. > > > > > > >> Please > > > > > > >> wait for that. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4885> is a big > > > > > > >> refactoring > > > > > > >> and, though I’d love to get it in before the release, it isn’t > > > going > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > >> happen. Don’t wait for it. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I also see the following as open or in progress and > fix-in-1.29: > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4872> (Will > > Noble) > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4908> (Woonsan > > Koo) > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4704> > (Stamatis) > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4737> (Thomas > > > Rebele) > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4860> (Zhe Hu / > > > Duan > > > > > > >> Xiong) > > > > > > >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907 < > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4907> > (Francesco > > > > Gini) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> What’s the status on those? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Julian > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622 < > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2622> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> PS It feels churlish to bring this up, but in time-honored > > > tradition > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> email subject has been ‘[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite x.y.z’. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:37 AM, Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Hi community, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> To prepare for Calcite 1.29.0 release, I will start to check > the > > > > > > >> JIRA > > > > > > >> list > > > > > > >> [1] which marks its fix version as 1.29.0 (9 JIRA as of now > > > remains > > > > > > >> open/in > > > > > > >> progress) and also the pending PRs which looks promising to be > > > > > > >> merged. > > > > > > >> Please help resolve/review/merge JIRA/PRs if you want some > fixes > > > to > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > >> released. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> My current goal is to start freezing the main branch of > Calcite > > by > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > >> end > > > > > > >> of this week. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Please let me know if you have any questions. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1]: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4941?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.29.0 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -Rui > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> Francesco Gini > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
