Hi Andrei, The followings need review process to merge. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4512 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5045 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5043 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4987 It would be great if they were fixed in this release.
Dmitry Sysolyatin <[email protected]> 于2022年6月14日周二 17:18写道： > Hi! > It would be good to merge: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5134 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5127 > > Both of those issues are related to correct execution queries with > subqueries. > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:59 AM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks to all who reviewed the PRs for 1.31 release. > > > > There are about 16 issues remaining tagged for 1.31 (list > > < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.31.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22In%20Review%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > ). > > > > Please let me know which ones are important for this release (and I'll > > wait) otherwise I'll re-tag those issues for next release 1.32. > > > > Regards, > > Andrei. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:05 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I’m on vacation this week so don’t ask me to review PRs. > > > > > > It looks like we’re on course for an RC this week, and definitely don’t > > > wait for me. Maybe we can get a few more PRs merged before then, and > move > > > the rest to 1.32 (or clear the fix version if the person who agreed to > > fix > > > the bug has not responded). > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 2022, at 2:17 PM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I have created a JIRA filter > > > > < > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.31.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22In%20Review%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > > > > for 1.31 release. There are currently 25 unresolved issues (planned > for > > > > 1.31). > > > > > > > > If you are familiar with some of the JIRA tickets can you please > review > > > the > > > > PRs and resolve the ticket ? > > > > > > > > The plan is to have an RC in 1-2 weeks. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Andrei. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 6:13 AM Vova Vysotskyi <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> Could we also include https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2305 > > into > > > >> this release? > > > >> I have rebased it onto the latest master and fixed all merge > > conflicts. > > > >> > > > >> Kind regards, > > > >> Volodymyr Vysotskyi > > > >> > > > >> On 2022/05/30 17:57:28 Julian Hyde wrote: > > > >>> Viliam, I marked the Jira case ‘fix in 1.31’ so that someone will > at > > > >> least review your PR. > > > >>> > > > >>>> On May 30, 2022, at 7:09 AM, Viliam Durina > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Our PR is reasonably simple and as far as I'm aware, it doesn't > need > > > >> more > > > >>>> changes, we'd be glad to find a reviewer and having it merged: > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2808 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Viliam > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 21:49, Julian Hyde <[email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> +1 mid-june release, and thank you to Ruben for sending the > > reminder. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Three weeks ago we had a discussion about the fixVersion [1] > field > > > and > > > >>>>> seemed to reach consensus. There were new responsibilities for > the > > > >> release > > > >>>>> manager, as described here by Ruben: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Before starting the release process for version X, the > > > >>>>>> release manager should take a look at Jira and find any > > > >>>>>> tickets with fixVersion=X which are not resolved, and > > > >>>>>> then act on a case by case basis, I guess starting a > > > >>>>>> discussion on each ticket comments (so that > > > >>>>>> everything is logged) with the reporter or any other > > > >>>>>> contributor which may have done some work on it: > > > >>>>>> - If the ticket is considered as a "Blocker", the release > > > >>>>>> process shall wait until it is done. > > > >>>>>> - If the ticket is not a blocker: > > > >>>>>> -- If it is reasonable to assume that it can be part of > > > >>>>>> the next (X+1) release (e.g. because work has > > > >>>>>> started already, just some elements are left to be > > > >>>>>> done etc.), the fixVersion can be changed into X+1. > > > >>>>>> -- Otherwise its fixVersion shall be cleared ("unassigned"). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Andrei, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Can you carry out the process described above? (It’s bad news for > > > you, > > > >>>>> because there are several issues that have been shunted forward > > > >> several > > > >>>>> times, but next release there should be fewer issues.) It > basically > > > >>>>> involves starting a conversation on every open/reopened JIRA case > > > >> that is > > > >>>>> marked fixVersion=1.31 about a week before the RC. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> If the process works we’ll add it to the HOWTO. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Julian > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/g8tjg0qxbot8b69rgv3poo618o3xvob1 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On May 26, 2022, at 12:58 AM, xiong duan <[email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li <[email protected]> 于2022年5月26日周四 10:31写道： > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC. > > > >>>>>>> Thanks Ruben for driving this, and Andrei for being the RM. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> For me, I have two PRs[1][2] which I think it's good to have > them > > > in > > > >>>>> 1.31.0 > > > >>>>>>> And for other issues which I've not opened pr yet, I think it's > > > >>>>> reasonable > > > >>>>>>> to postpone them to next version. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2791 > > > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2813 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> 于2022年5月26日周四 09:16写道： > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Andrei, are you still available for the task? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Yes. I'm happy to be the Release Manager for 1.31 > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:15 PM Chunwei Lei < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for taking care of this, Ruben. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>>>> Chunwei > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ruben Q L <[email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> It has been more than two months since our last release [1], > > and > > > >> I > > > >>>>>>>> think > > > >>>>>>>>> we > > > >>>>>>>>>> should make an effort to continue keeping the rhythm of one > > > >> release > > > >>>>>>>> every > > > >>>>>>>>>> two months approximately. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the next release manager would be > Andrei > > > >> Sereda > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]. > > > >>>>>>>>>> Andrei, are you still available for the task? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [3] and Github > [4], > > > >> there > > > >>>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>>>>> many pending issues that could / should be part of the > > release. > > > >> I'd > > > >>>>>>>>> propose > > > >>>>>>>>>> to make a collective effort to try to clean up our 1.31 > > backlog: > > > >>>>>>>> complete > > > >>>>>>>>>> and merge the PRs which are in a reasonably good state, and > > push > > > >> back > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.32 (or unassigned version) the Jira tickets that are not > > > >> advanced > > > >>>>>>>>> enough > > > >>>>>>>>>> to be part of this release. Shall we give ourselves around > two > > > >> weeks > > > >>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>> this and aim at mid-June for the first RC? WDYT? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ruben > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] > > https://calcite.apache.org/news/2022/03/19/release-1.30.0/ > > > >>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ykbhhxmljw6wg50rxs6ypp35173hlkdv > > > >>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > > >>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Best, > > > >>>>>>> Benchao Li > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> This message contains confidential information and is intended > only > > > >> for the > > > >>>> individuals named. If you are not the named addressee you should > not > > > >>>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the > > sender > > > >>>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake > > and > > > >>>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be > > > >>>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be > > > >> intercepted, > > > >>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain > > > >> viruses. > > > >>>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or > > > >> omissions > > > >>>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail > > > >>>> transmission. If verification is required, please request a > > hard-copy > > > >>>> version. -Hazelcast > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
