Thanks for the feedback.

@Stamatis, I included the answer to this (minor) question in this quarter's
report because after the last one I received an automatic email from the
secretary (with [email protected] in cc) mentioning the question
and stating that "Comments that do not ask specific questions should be
noted by the PMC and taken into consideration as appropriate for future
board reports. Where a comment asks a specific question, it should be
answered in your next board report unless otherwise stated in the
comment."; so my understanding was that, for this specific case, it was
simply required an answer in the following report.

@Julian, I hesitated about that because technically the committer additions
were effective on 2022-07-04, but the internal process started at the end
of June. But I guess you are right, since it is something relevant which
breaks an impasse in the committer list, I will update the "Membership
Data" section with the new committers before submitting the final report
(hopefully, for the Q3 report we will have newer additions to be mentioned
:)

Best,
Ruben


On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:15 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks for getting this written on schedule.
>
> I know we try to only report what happened in the quarter (i.e. up to
> June 30th) but since we have two new committers (yay!) I see no harm
> in including them.
>
> Julian
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:49 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for putting this together Ruben! LGTM, just a minor comment.
> >
> > When the board raises a comment/question we can reply by sending an email
> > to the board@ list. We don't need to wait for the next quarter to put
> this
> > information in the board report. This was a minor remark and probably it
> is
> > fine even if we don't reply at all but for more serious matters they
> expect
> > timely answers.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:00 PM Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Thanks Ruben!
> > > --
> > > Michael Mior
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> > > Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 07:52, Ruben Q L <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Below these lines you can find a draft of this quarter's board
> report. I
> > > > plan to submit it
> > > > at the end of this week.
> > > > Please let me know if you have any additions or corrections. Note
> that
> > > our
> > > > last report got a question from the board, for which I include a
> proposed
> > > > answer in this report (cf "Issues" section).
> > > > Best,
> > > > Ruben
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ## Description:
> > > > Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
> > > planning
> > > > queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows database-like
> > > > access,
> > > > and in particular a SQL interface and advanced query optimization,
> for
> > > data
> > > > not residing in a traditional database.
> > > >
> > > > Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework for
> > > > building
> > > > local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has an
> > > independent
> > > > release schedule and its own repository.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ## Issues:
> > > > There are no issues requiring board attention.
> > > >
> > > > The last report got one comment from the board:
> > > > "It's certainly up to you all, but please remember that these
> reports are
> > > >  published, publicly. Are you sure you want to have your names and
> email
> > > >  addresses as part of this (public) report?".
> > > >
> > > > There is no problem from our side. This report has been pre-approved
> by
> > > the
> > > > Calcite community and the section with names / emails has already
> been
> > > part
> > > > of
> > > > our reports in the "community health" section for a while. We
> decided to
> > > > add it some time ago to highlight the contributions from
> non-committers
> > > and
> > > > the top reviewers, in order to encourage the members of the
> community.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ## Membership Data:
> > > > Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-22 (7 years ago)
> > > > There are currently 56 committers and 25 PMC members in this project.
> > > > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 7:4.
> > > >
> > > > Community changes, past quarter:
> > > > - Chunwei Lei was added to the PMC on 2022-05-24
> > > > - Vladimir Ozerov was added to the PMC on 2022-05-24
> > > > - No new committers. Last addition was Alessandro Solimando on
> > > 2021-12-17.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ## Project Activity:
> > > > Avatica 1.21.0 was released on 2022-05-08, it was a maintenance
> release
> > > > with
> > > > dependency upgrades and added support for Oracle JDK 16 to 18. Of
> > > > particular
> > > > note is Log4j2 being upgrade to 2.16.0 and subsequently 2.17.0 and
> 2.17.1
> > > > to
> > > > address CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45105 and CVE-2021-44832.
> > > >
> > > > There has not been any Calcite release in this quarter. Calcite
> 1.31.0
> > > was
> > > > planned for mid-June, but it has suffered a small delay. It should be
> > > > released
> > > > during July.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ## Community Health:
> > > > The overall status of the community is healthy and stable. We are
> keeping
> > > > the
> > > > good momentum in terms of contributions and opened discussions to
> improve
> > > > the
> > > > project. This is reflected also on the statistics of Jira & GitHub
> > > > activity:
> > > > -1% issues opened, +9% issues closed, -9% commits, +18% code
> > > contributors,
> > > > -11% PRs opened, +21% PRs closed.
> > > >
> > > > As usual, we struggle a bit on the PRs reviews, with some of them
> being
> > > > opened
> > > > and blocked for a while due a lack of active reviewers. This fact has
> > > > triggered an interesting discussion in both the Apache Calcite and
> Apache
> > > > Flink communities about the pros and cons of forking Calcite by the
> > > latter.
> > > > Many voices from the Apache Calcite community advised against this
> idea,
> > > > due
> > > > to the elevated maintenance costs in the long term. Instead, we are
> > > > discussing
> > > > several ideas about how to improve our PR review situation, among
> them
> > > the
> > > > possibility of increasing the number of reviewers by granting Calcite
> > > > committership per request to people who are already ASF committers
> (in
> > > > other
> > > > projects) and have a proven record of working with Calcite (on a
> case by
> > > > case
> > > > basis to be approved by the Calcite PMC).
> > > >
> > > > The number of non-committer (contributor) commits per month:
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > |        year         |        month        | contributor_commits |
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > | 2022                | 4                   | 15                  |
> > > > | 2022                | 5                   | 13                  |
> > > > | 2022                | 6                   | 19                  |
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > >
> > > > The number of active reviewers per month:
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > |        year         |        month        |  active_reviewers   |
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > | 2022                | 4                   | 9                   |
> > > > | 2022                | 5                   | 5                   |
> > > > | 2022                | 6                   | 7                   |
> > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > >
> > > > Top reviewers in the last 3 months:
> > > >
> > >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > > |                          committer                           |
> reviews
> > > |
> > > >
> > >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > > | Julian Hyde <[email protected]>                               | 13
> > >   |
> > > > | chunwei <[email protected]>       | 13
> > >   |
> > > > | rubenada <[email protected]>                                 | 5
> > >  |
> > > > | Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>                      | 4
> > >  |
> > > > | chunwei.lcw <[email protected]>                         | 3
> > >  |
> > > > | hsyuan <[email protected]>            | 2
> > >  |
> > > > | Jess Balint <[email protected]>                              | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | chunwei.lcw <[email protected]>                    | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | xzh <[email protected]>                                       | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | yuzhao.cyz <[email protected]>                            | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]>                         | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | NobiGo <[email protected]>                                 | 1
> > >  |
> > > > | Alessandro Solimando <[email protected]>        | 1
> > >  |
> > > >
> > >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to