Thanks for pointing this out Ruben, I didn't remember the email.

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022, 10:33 PM Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> @Stamatis, I included the answer to this (minor) question in this quarter's
> report because after the last one I received an automatic email from the
> secretary (with priv...@calcite.apache.org in cc) mentioning the question
> and stating that "Comments that do not ask specific questions should be
> noted by the PMC and taken into consideration as appropriate for future
> board reports. Where a comment asks a specific question, it should be
> answered in your next board report unless otherwise stated in the
> comment."; so my understanding was that, for this specific case, it was
> simply required an answer in the following report.
>
> @Julian, I hesitated about that because technically the committer additions
> were effective on 2022-07-04, but the internal process started at the end
> of June. But I guess you are right, since it is something relevant which
> breaks an impasse in the committer list, I will update the "Membership
> Data" section with the new committers before submitting the final report
> (hopefully, for the Q3 report we will have newer additions to be mentioned
> :)
>
> Best,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for getting this written on schedule.
> >
> > I know we try to only report what happened in the quarter (i.e. up to
> > June 30th) but since we have two new committers (yay!) I see no harm
> > in including them.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:49 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for putting this together Ruben! LGTM, just a minor comment.
> > >
> > > When the board raises a comment/question we can reply by sending an
> email
> > > to the board@ list. We don't need to wait for the next quarter to put
> > this
> > > information in the board report. This was a minor remark and probably
> it
> > is
> > > fine even if we don't reply at all but for more serious matters they
> > expect
> > > timely answers.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 9:00 PM Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 Thanks Ruben!
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Mior
> > > > mm...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 07:52, Ruben Q L <rube...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > Below these lines you can find a draft of this quarter's board
> > report. I
> > > > > plan to submit it
> > > > > at the end of this week.
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any additions or corrections. Note
> > that
> > > > our
> > > > > last report got a question from the board, for which I include a
> > proposed
> > > > > answer in this report (cf "Issues" section).
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Ruben
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Description:
> > > > > Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
> > > > planning
> > > > > queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows
> database-like
> > > > > access,
> > > > > and in particular a SQL interface and advanced query optimization,
> > for
> > > > data
> > > > > not residing in a traditional database.
> > > > >
> > > > > Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework
> for
> > > > > building
> > > > > local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has an
> > > > independent
> > > > > release schedule and its own repository.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Issues:
> > > > > There are no issues requiring board attention.
> > > > >
> > > > > The last report got one comment from the board:
> > > > > "It's certainly up to you all, but please remember that these
> > reports are
> > > > >  published, publicly. Are you sure you want to have your names and
> > email
> > > > >  addresses as part of this (public) report?".
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no problem from our side. This report has been
> pre-approved
> > by
> > > > the
> > > > > Calcite community and the section with names / emails has already
> > been
> > > > part
> > > > > of
> > > > > our reports in the "community health" section for a while. We
> > decided to
> > > > > add it some time ago to highlight the contributions from
> > non-committers
> > > > and
> > > > > the top reviewers, in order to encourage the members of the
> > community.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Membership Data:
> > > > > Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-22 (7 years ago)
> > > > > There are currently 56 committers and 25 PMC members in this
> project.
> > > > > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 7:4.
> > > > >
> > > > > Community changes, past quarter:
> > > > > - Chunwei Lei was added to the PMC on 2022-05-24
> > > > > - Vladimir Ozerov was added to the PMC on 2022-05-24
> > > > > - No new committers. Last addition was Alessandro Solimando on
> > > > 2021-12-17.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Project Activity:
> > > > > Avatica 1.21.0 was released on 2022-05-08, it was a maintenance
> > release
> > > > > with
> > > > > dependency upgrades and added support for Oracle JDK 16 to 18. Of
> > > > > particular
> > > > > note is Log4j2 being upgrade to 2.16.0 and subsequently 2.17.0 and
> > 2.17.1
> > > > > to
> > > > > address CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45105 and CVE-2021-44832.
> > > > >
> > > > > There has not been any Calcite release in this quarter. Calcite
> > 1.31.0
> > > > was
> > > > > planned for mid-June, but it has suffered a small delay. It should
> be
> > > > > released
> > > > > during July.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Community Health:
> > > > > The overall status of the community is healthy and stable. We are
> > keeping
> > > > > the
> > > > > good momentum in terms of contributions and opened discussions to
> > improve
> > > > > the
> > > > > project. This is reflected also on the statistics of Jira & GitHub
> > > > > activity:
> > > > > -1% issues opened, +9% issues closed, -9% commits, +18% code
> > > > contributors,
> > > > > -11% PRs opened, +21% PRs closed.
> > > > >
> > > > > As usual, we struggle a bit on the PRs reviews, with some of them
> > being
> > > > > opened
> > > > > and blocked for a while due a lack of active reviewers. This fact
> has
> > > > > triggered an interesting discussion in both the Apache Calcite and
> > Apache
> > > > > Flink communities about the pros and cons of forking Calcite by the
> > > > latter.
> > > > > Many voices from the Apache Calcite community advised against this
> > idea,
> > > > > due
> > > > > to the elevated maintenance costs in the long term. Instead, we are
> > > > > discussing
> > > > > several ideas about how to improve our PR review situation, among
> > them
> > > > the
> > > > > possibility of increasing the number of reviewers by granting
> Calcite
> > > > > committership per request to people who are already ASF committers
> > (in
> > > > > other
> > > > > projects) and have a proven record of working with Calcite (on a
> > case by
> > > > > case
> > > > > basis to be approved by the Calcite PMC).
> > > > >
> > > > > The number of non-committer (contributor) commits per month:
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > > |        year         |        month        | contributor_commits |
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > > | 2022                | 4                   | 15                  |
> > > > > | 2022                | 5                   | 13                  |
> > > > > | 2022                | 6                   | 19                  |
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > >
> > > > > The number of active reviewers per month:
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > > |        year         |        month        |  active_reviewers   |
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > > | 2022                | 4                   | 9                   |
> > > > > | 2022                | 5                   | 5                   |
> > > > > | 2022                | 6                   | 7                   |
> > > > > +---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
> > > > >
> > > > > Top reviewers in the last 3 months:
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > > > |                          committer                           |
> > reviews
> > > > |
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > > > | Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>                               |
> 13
> > > >   |
> > > > > | chunwei <37774589+chunwei...@users.noreply.github.com>       |
> 13
> > > >   |
> > > > > | rubenada <rube...@gmail.com>                                 | 5
> > > >  |
> > > > > | Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>                      | 4
> > > >  |
> > > > > | chunwei.lcw <chunwei.l...@gmail.com>                         | 3
> > > >  |
> > > > > | hsyuan <15352793+hsy...@users.noreply.github.com>            | 2
> > > >  |
> > > > > | Jess Balint <jbal...@gmail.com>                              | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | chunwei.lcw <chunwei....@alibaba-inc.com>                    | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | xzh <953396...@qq.com>                                       | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | yuzhao.cyz <yuzhao....@gmail.com>                            | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | Vladimir Ozerov <ppoze...@gmail.com>                         | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | NobiGo <nobigo...@gmail.com>                                 | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > > | Alessandro Solimando <alessandro.solima...@gmail.com>        | 1
> > > >  |
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------+---------+
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to