It should be all good now.

My problem was that I use different accounts for github and gitbox.

For some reason the gradle release plugin was using github credentials (
asfGitSourceUsername property) and not nexus ones (asfNexusUsername) from
~/.gradle/gradle.properties. Maybe because of the pushRepositoryProvider
override ?



On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:47 PM Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Julian. I did include GITBOX in the prepare vote command.
>
> $ gradle  prepareVote -Prc=0 -Pasf -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITBOX
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:31 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Andrei, Are you perhaps running into
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4856 ?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 7:36 AM Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Quick update.
>> >
>> > I've addressed all comments in the release notes PR.
>> >
>> > While tagging RC0, I've run into small issue with apache gitbox
>> > authorization (see below) but should be able to solve them (I've
>> released
>> > 1.25 in the past without problems with the new gradle process)
>> >
>> >
>> > > Task :pushRcTag
>> > Pushing tag to Git remote release-origin:
>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite.git
>> >
>> > > Task :pushRcTag FAILED
>> >
>> > Build calcite FAILURE reason:
>> >     Execution failed for task ':pushRcTag':
>> >        * Caused by: org.eclipse.jgit.api.errors.TransportException:
>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite.git
>> > <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite.git>: not authorized*
>> >             at
>> org.eclipse.jgit.api.PushCommand.call(PushCommand.java:180)
>> >             at
>> >
>> com.github.vlsi.gradle.release.jgit.dsl.GitExtensionsKt.push(GitExtensions.kt:132)
>> >             at
>> >
>> com.github.vlsi.gradle.release.GitPushTask$pushTag$1.invoke(GitPushTask.kt:54)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:14 AM Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Julian,
>> > >
>> > > I think it is a great idea.
>> > >
>> > > Please take a look at proposed release notes:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2858
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Andrei.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:31 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Andrei,
>> > >>
>> > >> One thing that has worked well is for the RM to create a PR with the
>> > >> release notes. People can then review the release notes, comment on
>> that
>> > >> PR, and add their own release notes. As RM you would not submit the
>> PR, but
>> > >> instead manually rebase onto the final RC.
>> > >>
>> > >> Julian
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> > On Jul 19, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Hello,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Anything specific you'd like to be added to the release notes of
>> 1.31 ?
>> > >> > If so, please provide a short summary as well as JIRA id.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Andrei.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:07 PM Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Hi Julian,
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Andrei, Are there any remaining blockers for 1.31?
>> > >> >> No blockers for 1.31. Any pending issues can be moved towards
>> 1.32.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Can we proceed with an RC0?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Yes, I'll start the release very soon.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Thanks for fixing the regression.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Andrei.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:35 PM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> I merged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5194 <
>> > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5194>, the fix
>> for the
>> > >> >>> regression due to
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-35 <
>> > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-35>, yesterday.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Andrei, Are there any remaining blockers for 1.31? Can we proceed
>> > >> with an
>> > >> >>> RC0?
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Julian
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>> On Jun 21, 2022, at 11:29 PM, Yanjing Wang <
>> > >> zhuangzixiao...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> Thanks Andrei, now there is nobody to review these PRs, It's ok
>> to
>> > >> >>> change
>> > >> >>>> to 1.32,I think pr-2838 <
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2838
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> for
>> > >> >>>> CALCITE-5045 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5045>
>> > >> >>> should be
>> > >> >>>> merged before 1.31, because it's simple and Yingyu Wang
>> encountered
>> > >> >>> this
>> > >> >>>> problem also.
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com> 于2022年6月22日周三 10:06写道:
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Julian, how much time do you think is necessary to fix
>> CALCITE-35
>> > >> >>>>> regression ?
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Yanjing, I see some discussions/attempts in JIRA/github to
>> review
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> PRs.
>> > >> >>>>> Do you think it can still be reviewed and merged before 1.31 ?
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Viliam (and Julian), thanks for fixing (and merging)
>> CALCITE-5157
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Dmitry (and Stamatis / Ruben), thanks for fixing (and merging)
>> > >> >>>>> CALCITE-5134.
>> > >> >>>>> As I understand CALCITE-5127 is delayed until 1.32 ?
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:57 AM Julian Hyde <
>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> I agree that it’s a regression, and caused by my CALCITE-35
>> change.
>> > >> >>> I’ve
>> > >> >>>>>> assigned the bug to myself. I’m not sure I have time to fix
>> it this
>> > >> >>> week,
>> > >> >>>>>> so we can back out my change if necessary to get the release
>> out on
>> > >> >>>>>> schedule. If someone else can fix it I would be grateful.
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> On Jun 19, 2022, at 2:26 AM, Vova Vysotskyi <
>> volody...@apache.org
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Hello,
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> I have found the following regression while verifying the new
>> > >> release
>> > >> >>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>> work with Apache Drill:
>> > >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5194
>> > >> >>>>>> .
>> > >> >>>>>>> This issue appeared after changes for
>> > >> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-35.
>> > >> >>>>>>> Since it is a regression, I suggest treating it as a blocker
>> for
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>>>>> upcoming release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> Kind regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>> > >> >>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>> On 2022/06/16 06:38:45 Viliam Durina wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>> I'll try to work on comments in CALCITE-5157
>> > >> >>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5157> today
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 07:30, Yanjing Wang <
>> > >> >>> zhuangzixiao...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Andrei,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The followings need review process to merge.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4512
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5045
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5043
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4987
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> It would be great if they were fixed in this release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Dmitry Sysolyatin <dm.sysolya...@gmail.com> 于2022年6月14日周二
>> > >> 17:18写道:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> It would be good to merge:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5134
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5127
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Both of those issues are related to correct execution
>> queries
>> > >> with
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> subqueries.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:59 AM Andrei Sereda <
>> > >> aser...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all who reviewed the PRs for 1.31 release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> There are about 16 issues remaining tagged for 1.31 (list
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.31.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22In%20Review%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ).
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know which ones are important for this
>> release
>> > >> (and
>> > >> >>>>>> I'll
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wait) otherwise I'll re-tag those issues for next release
>> > >> 1.32.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrei.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:05 PM Julian Hyde <
>> > >> >>>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I’m on vacation this week so don’t ask me to review PRs.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It looks like we’re on course for an RC this week, and
>> > >> >>> definitely
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> don’t
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wait for me. Maybe we can get a few more PRs merged
>> before
>> > >> then,
>> > >> >>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> move
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the rest to 1.32 (or clear the fix version if the
>> person who
>> > >> >>>>> agreed
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> fix
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the bug has not responded).
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2022, at 2:17 PM, Andrei Sereda <
>> > >> aser...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have created a JIRA filter
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.31.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22In%20Review%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 1.31 release. There are currently 25 unresolved
>> issues
>> > >> >>>>> (planned
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> for
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.31).
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you are familiar with some of the JIRA tickets can
>> you
>> > >> >>> please
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> review
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PRs and resolve the ticket ?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The plan is to have an RC in 1-2 weeks.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrei.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 6:13 AM Vova Vysotskyi <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we also include
>> > >> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2305
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> into
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this release?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have rebased it onto the latest master and fixed all
>> > >> merge
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022/05/30 17:57:28 Julian Hyde wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Viliam, I marked the Jira case ‘fix in 1.31’ so that
>> > >> someone
>> > >> >>>>> will
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> at
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> least review your PR.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 30, 2022, at 7:09 AM, Viliam Durina
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <vil...@hazelcast.com.INVALID> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our PR is reasonably simple and as far as I'm
>> aware, it
>> > >> >>>>> doesn't
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> need
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes, we'd be glad to find a reviewer and having
>> it
>> > >> >>> merged:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2808
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Viliam
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 21:49, Julian Hyde <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 mid-june release, and thank you to Ruben for
>> sending
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> reminder.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Three weeks ago we had a discussion about the
>> fixVersion
>> > >> >>> [1]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> field
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seemed to reach consensus. There were new
>> > >> responsibilities
>> > >> >>>>> for
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager, as described here by Ruben:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before starting the release process for version
>> X, the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manager should take a look at Jira and
>> find any
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets with fixVersion=X which are not resolved,
>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then act on a case by case basis, I guess
>> starting a
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion on each ticket comments (so that
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is logged) with the reporter or any
>> other
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributor which may have done some work on it:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - If the ticket is considered as a "Blocker", the
>> > >> release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process shall wait until it is done.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - If the ticket is not a blocker:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- If it is reasonable to assume that it can be
>> part of
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next (X+1) release (e.g. because work has
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started already, just some elements are left to be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done etc.), the fixVersion can be changed into
>> X+1.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Otherwise its fixVersion shall be cleared
>> > >> >>> ("unassigned").
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrei,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you carry out the process described above?
>> (It’s bad
>> > >> >>> news
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> for
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> you,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because there are several issues that have been
>> shunted
>> > >> >>>>> forward
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> several
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times, but next release there should be fewer
>> issues.)
>> > >> It
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> basically
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involves starting a conversation on every
>> open/reopened
>> > >> >>> JIRA
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> case
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked fixVersion=1.31 about a week before the RC.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the process works we’ll add it to the HOWTO.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/g8tjg0qxbot8b69rgv3poo618o3xvob1
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 26, 2022, at 12:58 AM, xiong duan <
>> > >> >>>>> nobigo...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2022年5月26日周四
>> > >> 10:31写道:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Ruben for driving this, and Andrei for
>> being
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> RM.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, I have two PRs[1][2] which I think it's
>> good
>> > >> to
>> > >> >>>>> have
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> them
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.31.0
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And for other issues which I've not opened pr
>> yet, I
>> > >> >>> think
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> it's
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to postpone them to next version.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2791
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2813
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrei Sereda <aser...@gmail.com> 于2022年5月26日周四
>> > >> 09:16写道:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrei, are you still available for the task?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. I'm happy to be the Release Manager for
>> 1.31
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 9:15 PM Chunwei Lei <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> chunwei.l...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for taking care of this, Ruben.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chunwei
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ruben Q L <
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> rube...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been more than two months since our
>> last
>> > >> >>> release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> [1],
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should make an effort to continue keeping the
>> > >> rhythm
>> > >> >>> of
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> one
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two months approximately.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I am not mistaken, the next release manager
>> > >> would
>> > >> >>> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Andrei
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sereda
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2].
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrei, are you still available for the task?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [3]
>> and
>> > >> >>> Github
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [4],
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many pending issues that could / should be
>> part of
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> release.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make a collective effort to try to clean
>> up our
>> > >> >>> 1.31
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> backlog:
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complete
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and merge the PRs which are in a reasonably
>> good
>> > >> >>> state,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> push
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> back
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.32 (or unassigned version) the Jira tickets
>> that
>> > >> are
>> > >> >>>>> not
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> advanced
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be part of this release. Shall we give
>> ourselves
>> > >> >>>>> around
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> two
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this and aim at mid-June for the first RC?
>> WDYT?
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ruben
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://calcite.apache.org/news/2022/03/19/release-1.30.0/
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ykbhhxmljw6wg50rxs6ypp35173hlkdv
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Benchao Li
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message contains confidential information and
>> is
>> > >> >>> intended
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> only
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals named. If you are not the named
>> addressee you
>> > >> >>>>> should
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> not
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
>> > >> notify
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> sender
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this
>> e-mail by
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> mistake
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail
>> transmission
>> > >> >>>>> cannot
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information
>> > >> could
>> > >> >>> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> intercepted,
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
>> incomplete, or
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> contain
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> viruses.
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for
>> any
>> > >> >>> errors
>> > >> >>>>> or
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> omissions
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a
>> result
>> > >> of
>> > >> >>>>>>>>> e-mail
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmission. If verification is required, please
>> > >> request a
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> hard-copy
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. -Hazelcast
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>>> --
>> > >> >>>>>>>> This message contains confidential information and is
>> intended
>> > >> only
>> > >> >>>>> for
>> > >> >>>>>> the
>> > >> >>>>>>>> individuals named. If you are not the named addressee you
>> should
>> > >> not
>> > >> >>>>>>>> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify
>> the
>> > >> >>> sender
>> > >> >>>>>>>> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by
>> mistake
>> > >> >>> and
>> > >> >>>>>>>> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission
>> cannot
>> > >> be
>> > >> >>>>>>>> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could
>> be
>> > >> >>>>>> intercepted,
>> > >> >>>>>>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or
>> contain
>> > >> >>>>>> viruses.
>> > >> >>>>>>>> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any
>> errors or
>> > >> >>>>>> omissions
>> > >> >>>>>>>> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of
>> > >> e-mail
>> > >> >>>>>>>> transmission. If verification is required, please request a
>> > >> >>> hard-copy
>> > >> >>>>>>>> version. -Hazelcast
>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>>
>

Reply via email to