It totally makes sense to have expand=false since this is what we recommend.

It can be a notable change though for those using SqlToRelConverter as it
is so we have to at least put it in a prominent place in the release notes.

Best,
Stamatis


On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:32 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:

> You should definitely log a bug for this. Please do so.
>
> We would prefer that new features in SqlToRelConverter are developed
> with expand=false. (Rationale: Keeping subqueries as RexSubQuery
> expressions allows us to handle them later, via a planner rule, which
> makes the logic more composable and therefore less buggy.) But we will
> accept bug fixes to SqlToRelConverter running in expand=true mode if
> they are clean and simple.
>
> That's quite a big 'if'. I suspect that it's quite hard to make a fix
> without significant changes to SqlToRelConverter. If so, you should
> stop, because we are not likely to accept it.
>
> Calcite committers,
>
> For a while https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3870 has
> been open, proposing that expand=false is the default. Should we do
> it? I think it will clarify our position, and make people less likely
> to run into bugs when they use the old expand=true behavior by
> accident.
>
> Julian
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 9:57 AM Jonathan Sternberg <jonat...@bodo.ai>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using Calcite for a project and am attempting to implement the
> behavior
> > for ANY/ALL such as:
> >
> > SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE a = ANY(SELECT ...)
> >
> > When I attempt to have Calcite create a plan for this query, I get the
> > runtime exception from here:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/717eb59a73e2b456266da1af5ff9b881b6f7eeed/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L5319
> >
> > withExpand = true is the default behavior and, in other cases like
> HAVING,
> > it produces a more desirable plan so I'd prefer to keep withExpand to its
> > default value rather than overriding it. Is there a way to allow
> subqueries
> > to be expanded while also allowing subqueries that can't be expanded to
> > stay as subqueries? Would Calcite be open to a change that allowed this
> > behavior?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --Jonathan Sternberg
>

Reply via email to