It's true that I've never seen a fake PR so far in the ASF repos but
at the same time I am not following every single PR.
I can understand the approval for first time contributors but keeping
the approval for everyone seems a bit too much.

Best,
Stamatis

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:04 AM 王鹏 <peng713...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for this. I think it's very friendly to create PR for contributors.
>
> Dan Zou <zoud...@163.com> 于2023年3月29日周三 10:13写道:
>
> > +1 for this, it is something out of my expectation when I created my first
> > PR in calcite and informed that approval is required.
> >
> > Best,
> > Dan Zou
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > 2023年3月28日 21:37,Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 写道:
> > >
> > > I'm +1 for changing it back.
> > >
> > > I was also thinking about starting a discussion about this before, but I
> > > didn't know how to achieve it. Thanks Julian for sharing this with us.
> > >
> > > Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月28日周二 20:57写道:
> > >
> > >> (Forwarding from the Druid list for discussion.)
> > >>
> > >> Julian
> > >>
> > >> Begin forwarded message:
> > >>
> > >>> From: Gian Merlino <g...@apache.org>
> > >>> Date: March 28, 2023 at 1:24:42 AM CDT
> > >>> To: d...@druid.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: CI requiring approval for external contributors
> > >>> Reply-To: d...@druid.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>> Recently, ASF GitHub repos had their defaults for GitHub Actions
> > >> changed to
> > >>> "always require approval for external contributors". In Slack, Karan
> > >>> pointed out that Airflow has recently submitted a ticket to have that
> > >>> changed back: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24200. IMO,
> > we
> > >>> should do the same. I don't think we have a problem with fake PRs, but
> > we
> > >>> can always improve our responsiveness to contributors from outside the
> > >>> project! Every little bit helps, including running CI automatically.
> > >>>
> > >>> If others have opinions on this, let me know. I'd like to raise our own
> > >>> ticket to change our default.
> > >>>
> > >>> Gian
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Benchao Li
> >
> >

Reply via email to