+1 On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:33 AM Francis Chuang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for this. > > Also noticed this and found it to be annoying. > > On 19/04/2023 6:22 pm, Alessandro Solimando wrote: > > Hi Stamatis, > > +1000 on this, thanks for starting this discussion! > > > > Best regards, > > Alessandro > > > > On Wed 19 Apr 2023, 10:19 Stamatis Zampetakis, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Everything that happens in a GitHub PR creates a worklog entry under > >> the respective JIRA ticket. > >> For every worklog entry we receive a notification from [email protected] > >> when we are watching an issue. The worklog entry and email > >> notification usually appear messy. > >> > >> Moreover, if we are watching the GitHub PR we are going to get a > >> notification from [email protected] which has the same content > >> with the JIRA worklog entry and is much more readable. > >> > >> Finally, the PR notification is also going to > >> [email protected] so those who are subscribed to that list > >> will get the same notification three times. > >> > >> Personally, I never read the JIRA worklog notifications and I largely > >> prefer those from [email protected]. > >> > >> How do you feel about disabling the worklog entries in JIRA coming > >> from GitHub PRs? > >> > >> For archiving purposes, the notifications already go to commits@ so we > >> don't lose anything from disabling the worklog entries. On the > >> contrary, I find that this would reduce the noise and redundancy on > >> our inboxes. > >> > >> Concretely this is what I have in mind in terms of change: > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3166 > >> > >> Best, > >> Stamatis > >> > > >
