Can we do another quick pass over the open PRs, or is it too late?
Since we started the process a bunch of bug fixes were submitted, and some of 
them may be easy to merge.

Mihai
________________________________
From: Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 2:32 PM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.37.0

Upgrade of Avatica is done at CALCITE-6356 [1], thanks a lot for review
You can go forward with PRs if there still any

If there is no objections  I'm going to start steps to prepare and create
an RC tomorrow

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6356

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 8:14 PM Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am assuming that (one of) the next steps towards 1.37 will be a PR which
> upgrades Avatica to 1.25.
> Is anyone working on that?
> After that is merged I plan to merge two PRs which re-enable the tests that
> were disabled temporarily.
>
> Thank you,
> Mihai
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:48 AM Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This would be great, I am fixing two very basic bugs.
> > Was busy with some other stuff, so I didn't have time to figure out how
> to
> > submit the PRs so that they pass, if anyone has more detailed
> instructions
> > I would be very happy. Otherwise I will dig into it.
> >
> > Mihai
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org>
> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 17, 2024 2:44 PM
> > *To:* dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.37.0
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to jump in regarding CALCITE-6248 [1] and CALCITE-6282 (no
> > corresponding PRs in the Calcite repo yet).
> >
> > The corresponding PRs in the Avatica repo are:
> > - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/238
> > - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/241
> >
> > As the issue will require changes to both Calcite and Avatica in a
> > coordinated fashion, what do you guys think about releasing Avatica
> > 1.25.0 first? I can be RM for the Avatica release.
> >
> > Mihai, can you please confirm if this approach works for you?
> >
> > Discussion for getting changes simultaneously into both Avatica and
> > Calcite is here [2].
> >
> > Francis
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3708
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5w3ry3zbm7671ffp4pxh7lx6cgc5r3tq
> >
> > On 13/03/2024 10:07 pm, Benchao Li wrote:
> > > Thank you, Hongyu, for volunteering to be a release manager.
> > >
> > > What's worth to mention is that to be a release manager does not
> > > require PMC membership nor being a committer, and it is a good chance
> > > to be involved in community activities apart from code/discussion,
> > > which would be a good additional credit for being considered as
> > > committer or PMC member candidate.
> > >
> > > Hongyu Guo <guohongyu...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月13日周三 11:29写道:
> > >>
> > >> I would like to take on the role of RM for one release
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:58 AM Alessandro Solimando <
> > >> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey Sergey,
> > >>> thanks for being the release manager for 1.37.0.
> > >>>
> > >>> I have added fixVersion=1.37.0 to CALCITE-2040
> > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2040>, as its
> > associated PR
> > >>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3666> is in good shape IMO,
> > and we
> > >>> are trying to get it done shortly with Hongyu.
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Alessandro
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 16:49, Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Updates about 1.37.0 releasing
> > >>>>
> > >>>> According to our Jira dashboard [1] and Github [2], there
> > >>>> are 17 pending issues that could / should be part of the release.
> > >>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean up our
> 1.37.0
> > >>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd propose to
> > >>>> aim for about 2 weeks to release 1.37.0, this will give us about
> > >>>> some time to clean up pending PRs for the next version. What do you
> > >>> think?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good shape and
> want
> > >>>> to be included in 1.37.0, please mark the fixVersion to 1.37.0, this
> > >>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best to get it
> in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.37.0
> > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2
> > >>>>
> > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be merged
> > >>> shortly
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6138
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6015
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6283
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5607
> > >>>>
> > >>>>   #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3522
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6071
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6210
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6259
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2067
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6226
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6193
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It could happen that I miss something, please let me know
> > >>>> if there is something with fixVersion 1.37.0 ready for review and
> not
> > >>>> mentioned here
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Also I created a JIRA issue for releasing 1.37.0
> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6302
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:24 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 for a release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Our users rely on a regular cadence of releases. If someone
> submits a
> > >>>>> patch and doesn’t see it in a release until 6 months later (or it
> > sits
> > >>>>> un-reviewed) they will be less inclined to submit a patch.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yeah, I know Open Source Doesn’t Require Providing Builds [1] but
> it
> > >>>> makes
> > >>>>> everyone’s life easier.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Julian
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39094387
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Feb 21, 2024, at 1:18 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> zabe...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> With so many commits it's definitely a good time to cut a new
> > >>> release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I can be the RM for 1.39.0 or 1.40.0 depending on the timing.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Stamatis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:10 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <
> > >>> snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks for starting the discussion
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> @Sergey, are you still available for being the release manager
> for
> > >>>>> 1.37.0?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think so, in theory I could start with some steps in one/two
> > weeks
> > >>>> if
> > >>>>>>> there is no objections
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:29 PM Benchao Li <
> libenc...@apache.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It's been a bit more than 3 months since our last release
> > >>>> (2023-11-10)
> > >>>>>>>> [1] and there are currently 100+ new commits in main branch. Per
> > >>> our
> > >>>>>>>> tradition of producing one release every 2-3 months, I think
> it's
> > >>>> time
> > >>>>>>>> to consider for next release now.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> According to [2], the following release managers would be:
> > >>>>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin
> > >>>>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> @Sergey, are you still available for being the release manager
> for
> > >>>>> 1.37.0?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Besides, we need more volunteers for the next releases (version
> >=
> > >>>>>>>> 1.39.0), anyone who is interested in doing it can reply in this
> > >>>>>>>> thread.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-36-0
> > >>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>> Sergey
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Best regards,
> > >>>> Sergey
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>


--
Best regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to