Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.40.0, release
candidate 0.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.40.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md

The commit to be voted upon:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=770bac04efe974af338d3f732ae197df4c4e7b14

Its hash is 770bac04efe974af338d3f732ae197df4c4e7b14

Tag:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.40.0-rc0

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.40.0-rc0
(revision 77071)

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
b594e6d0c0e57d6569964f63a485c38879c4f8cff1e43a1a0a47c296495a2392099f3135a250fcad3bad8e94c32fdb02f99e84e7cf230ee619fa3576185b6bb7
*apache-calcite-1.40.0-src.tar.gz

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1246/org/apache/calcite/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/asolimando.asc
https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS

To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build"
(Requires an appropriate Gradle/JDK installation.)

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.40.0.
Everyone is welcome to vote. Your vote should contain the line
'code name (role)', where
  * 'code' is +1, 0 or -1 as below;
  * 'name' is your ASF id if you have one, else your real name;
  * 'role' is 'community', 'committer' or 'PMC member'.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.40.0
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

The vote is open for the next 72 hours (closing at
2025-05-26T08:00:00Z) and passes if a majority of
at least three +1 votes by PMC members are cast.

NOTES:
1) I have noticed that in the release notes some entries have a wrong
"<\a>" instead of "</a>", but usually minor issues with release notes are
considered OK as they can be addressed after the release vote

2) LICENSE file differs from that of git, it has been discussed in [1],
it's not considered a blocker and CALCITE-7036 [2] has been filed to
improve this aspect

Also considering these two notes, my vote is:

  +1 asolimando (PMC member)

Alessandro Solimando (release manager)

[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/hfxqnm0xc8l5nzdbsm2fon91rw94t3to
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7036

Reply via email to