So the dependency should be on the as yet unreleased artifact?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > Not yet. But they have told me that they intend to. And I think committing > that change to a public repository is a clear indication that they intend > to change the license. > > As you can see from comments in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-605 we still trying to > clarify this. > > Julian > > > > On Mar 10, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Has that change been released? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Pentaho changed the license from GPL to Apache. See > >> https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-aggdesigner/commit/8009426, made by > >> Pentaho's Chief Architect, Will Gorman. > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> > >>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Calcite has a runtime dependency on > >>> org.pentaho:pentaho-aggdesigner-algorithm:5.1.5-jhyde > >>> > >>> Juilan, > >>> Can you please clarify what is the source of that artifact? > >>> Is it actually safe under Apache 2 license? > >>> > >>> pentaho-aggdesigner is clearly GPL-2 licensed: > >>> > >> > https://github.com/pentaho/pentaho-aggdesigner/blob/master/pentaho-aggdesigner-core/gpl-2.0.txt > >>> > >>> I am not an expert in licensing issues, however I think it is not > >>> valid to change project license from GPL to whatever by merely > >>> performing a fork > >>> ( > >> > https://github.com/julianhyde/pentaho-aggdesigner/commit/c9dd9a057ec5a74eefeee63b3a519aa26c7733e2 > >> ). > >>> > >>> > >>> It looks like we should either drop pentaho-aggdesigner dependency, or > >>> convince pentaho to enable Apache 2 compatible usage of the artifact > >>> in question. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> Vladimir Sitnikov > >> > >> > >
