‎I'd made toResponse in LocalService using the json boolean too, but not in 
total agreement that the primitives type be change to Numeric, the layout in 
Squirrel is formating it as numbers base on number locale. I would vote for the 
column meta to be untouched and have separate cursor and accessor at the client 
end to do conversion to the right type.

As for having cache mechanism, I think is over kill, as most client use case 
would be fire sql, get results and store in local data structure and close 
(statement and result). Seldom will the getter be called on same row and column 
multiple times. I think options 3 lazy conversion works well till there's usage 
of IDL suggest in another post.

Best regards - Xavier

  Original Message
From: Julian Hyde
Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2015 02:20
To: [email protected]
Reply To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast for 
number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet


Yes, the "json" field (currently always true) is a hack. Ideally the transport 
(not the services at either end of it) should have opportunity to say that it 
does not preserve types.

What are you proposing to memoize? I would not memoize a result set. It uses 
significant memory on the client and might go stale.

Julian


> On Mar 27, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This same issue bit me along the way as well. I don't particularly care for
> the if (json) block in LocalService. Option (3) above sounds like a good
> choice, despite the repetition. Maybe we can memoize the results to avoid
> re-computation? Let's say we abstract out the transport later (maybe for
> 2.0) and allow pluggable implementations -- thrift, protobuf, &c. What
> would the ideal solution be for that scenario? Both of those tools provide
> stronger schema semantics.
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> So that the JSON will now look like "7f000001" instead of
>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="}
>>
>> Nothing wrong with base64 encoding.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Xavier Leong <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into creating a ListIteratorCursor to
>> use at the remote side, so that it will create the "generic" number
>> accessor instead of the ExactNumericAccessor, which I agree, should match
>> exact.
>>>
>>> I'll also be looking into fixing the ByteString serialized and
>> deserialized, it will use JSON getter to convert  byte[] to String, and
>> BinaryAccessor will reconvert it back to byte[] from String.
>>>
>>> So that the JSON will now look like "7f000001" instead of
>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="}
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Julian Hyde [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 3:25 PM
>>> To: dev
>>> Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast
>> for number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet
>>>
>>> I agree with your analysis. 1, 2, 3 are all viable options. 1 makes the
>> payload much larger, 2 would require invasive changes to the JSON parser,
>> so 3 is my preferred option. I think NumberAccessor does what you need.
>>>
>>> For the related problem, sending parameter from client to server, I
>> think we need to use option 1. The reason is that we don't know what the
>> parameter type "is supposed to be". The client can set a parameter to
>> (Long) 0, which would come across JSON as int 0. So we would need to also
>> send the type of each parameter value. Luckily, for parameters payload size
>> is not a concern.
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Xavier Leong <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Julian,
>>>>
>>>> Moving this to dev thread for wider audience.
>>>>
>>>> The accessor is created using the table column meta from the signature,
>> which I agree as if we are to reconstruct the data, the right place to look
>> for the correct type is from the column meta.
>>>>
>>>> The frame rows are serialized as Object, if we to make each result item
>> to be with strongly typed, then it will be inefficient to retain the type
>> info in the payload, but if we let the serializer to do the decision, some
>> type are not translated correctly, eg ByteString use for BINARY type, at
>> the remote side, it gets constructed as LinkedHashMap from the JSON
>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="} string.
>>>>
>>>> So, what I see there's 3 way to approach this:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Is to have the payload to be strongly typed with typed-value
>>>> representation
>>>> 2) Is to reconstruct the data during deserializing based on the column
>>>> meta
>>>> 3) Do conversion in accessor to present the correct data based on
>> column meta.
>>>>
>>>> Option 1 will be expensive on the payload, option 2 and 3 is somewhat
>> similar, 2 is to do it 1 time with penalty of longer blocking response, and
>> 3 is to do it lazily when data is access and penalty of repeated conversion
>> for every get.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Julian Hyde (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 6:47 AM
>>>> To: Xavier Leong
>>>> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast for
>>>> number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    [
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-647?page=com.atlassian.j
>>>> ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=143
>>>> 82864#comment-14382864 ]
>>>>
>>>> Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-647:
>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I agree with your analysis of the cause, but I don't agree with your
>> solution. ByteAccessor is an accessor for values that are known to be of
>> type Byte, so it doesn't need to be fixed; you shouldn't be using it for
>> JSON data. I think you should be using a different accessor, maybe like
>> NumberAccessor, that doesn't make assumptions about the exact type of the
>> values.
>>>>
>>>> Note I added the "boolean json" field to LocalService recently. That
>> was for a very similar purpose.
>>>>
>>>> This fix is not complete without a test case. Without one, we will very
>> easily regress.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think there is a test suite in Avatica that serializes requests
>> and responses to JSON and back. (It doesn't need to send them over HTTP, so
>> it can run in a single thread in a single JVM.) That would have discovered
>> this issue, and probably several similar issues. Maybe you could create a
>> variant of RemoteDriverTest that does this.
>>>>
>>>> Can you also please check whether this issue exists for parameters? I
>> think if you have a long or double parameter and set it to 0, the value
>> will arrive at the server as an int. The server needs to be able to handle
>> that.
>>>>
>>>> [~ndimiduk] Can you please review the tests in Avatica, plus
>>>> CalciteRemoteDriverTest. If the tests don't have coverage for basic
>>>> functionality (all data types, all request/response types, over all
>>>> transports) please log jira cases. (Now we have JdbcMeta  and the
>>>> scott JDBC database, we could consider moving much of
>>>> CalciteRemoteDriverTest into Avatica; CalciteRemoteDriverTest would be
>>>> just a sub-class of that test that uses CalciteMeta rather than
>>>> JdbcMeta.)
>>>>
>>>>> Avatica cursor type cast for number cause exception in
>>>>> AvaticaResultSet
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>                Key: CALCITE-647
>>>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-647
>>>>>            Project: Calcite
>>>>>         Issue Type: Bug
>>>>>   Affects Versions: 1.1.0-incubating
>>>>>           Reporter: Xavier FH Leong
>>>>>           Assignee: Julian Hyde
>>>>>             Labels: avatica
>>>>>        Attachments: CALCITE-647-cursor-numberTypeCast.patch
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> After the result are deserialized from JSON on remote side, the object
>> is not with it's original type, forcing casing of box type Long on Integer
>> raise exception.
>>>>> For all box number, it will type cast to Number and extract using the
>> Number method instead.
>>>>> 2015-03-26 15:49:48,154 [Thread-10] ERROR
>>>>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader  - Error reading
>>>>> column data, column index = 3
>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer incompatible with
>> java.lang.Long
>>>>>      at
>> org.apache.calcite.avatica.util.AbstractCursor$LongAccessor.getLong(AbstractCursor.java:483)
>>>>>      at
>> org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaResultSet.getLong(AvaticaResultSet.java:252)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.cellcomponent.DataTypeLong.readResultSet(DataTypeLong.java:365)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.cellcomponent.CellComponentFactory.readResultSet(CellComponentFactory.java:488)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader.doContentTabRead(ResultSetReader.java:613)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader.readRow(ResultSetReader.java:184)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet.createRow(ResultSetDataSet.java:237)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet._setResultSet(ResultSetDataSet.java:203)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet.setSqlExecutionTabResultSet(ResultSetDataSet.java:126)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.mainpanel.SQLExecutionHandler.sqlResultSetAvailable(SQLExecutionHandler.java:410)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.processResultSet(SQLExecuterTask.java:542)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.processQuery(SQLExecuterTask.java:407)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.run(SQLExecuterTask.java:205)
>>>>>      at
>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.util.TaskExecuter.run(TaskExecuter.java:82)
>>>>>      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:853)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>>> (v6.3.4#6332)
>>>>
>>>> DISCLAIMER
>>>> ==========
>>>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which
>> is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use
>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
>> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
>> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected
>> mails.
>>>>
>>>
>>> DISCLAIMER
>>> ==========
>>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is
>> the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of
>> the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print,
>> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message.
>> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected
>> mails.
>>>
>>


DISCLAIMER
==========
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, distribute or 
use this message. If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. Persistent Systems 
Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.

Reply via email to