I don't think we can declare victory on our support for even basic data types until we have done exhaustive testing.
In CalciteRemoteDriverTest.testParameterConvert, I test PreparedStatement.setObject(int, Object, int) with every combination of source & destination types that are allowed by the JDBC spec. We also need to test PreparedStatement.setObject(int, Object) (i.e. converting to what Calcite thinks the parameter should be), all of the PreparedStatement.setXxx methods, and all of the ResultSet.getXxx methods. I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-656 for this. Any volunteers to implement it? Julian > On Mar 30, 2015, at 12:56 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > I saw something similar going the other direction with JMeter for > PreparedStatements -- it was using setObject always and expecting the > underlying implementation do coerce. See CALCITE-630. > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is Squirrel causing getObject? If it were calling type-specific methods >> such as getInt or getDouble the formatting would be OK. >> >> I think getObject needs to convert to the specific type not keep the value >> in the representation type. >> >>> On Mar 30, 2015, at 05:54, Xavier Leong <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'd made toResponse in LocalService using the json boolean too, but not >> in total agreement that the primitives type be change to Numeric, the >> layout in Squirrel is formating it as numbers base on number locale. I >> would vote for the column meta to be untouched and have separate cursor and >> accessor at the client end to do conversion to the right type. >>> >>> As for having cache mechanism, I think is over kill, as most client use >> case would be fire sql, get results and store in local data structure and >> close (statement and result). Seldom will the getter be called on same row >> and column multiple times. I think options 3 lazy conversion works well >> till there's usage of IDL suggest in another post. >>> >>> Best regards - Xavier >>> >>> Original Message >>> From: Julian Hyde >>> Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2015 02:20 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Reply To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast >> for number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet >>> >>> >>> Yes, the "json" field (currently always true) is a hack. Ideally the >> transport (not the services at either end of it) should have opportunity to >> say that it does not preserve types. >>> >>> What are you proposing to memoize? I would not memoize a result set. It >> uses significant memory on the client and might go stale. >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 27, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This same issue bit me along the way as well. I don't particularly care >> for >>>> the if (json) block in LocalService. Option (3) above sounds like a good >>>> choice, despite the repetition. Maybe we can memoize the results to >> avoid >>>> re-computation? Let's say we abstract out the transport later (maybe for >>>> 2.0) and allow pluggable implementations -- thrift, protobuf, &c. What >>>> would the ideal solution be for that scenario? Both of those tools >> provide >>>> stronger schema semantics. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> So that the JSON will now look like "7f000001" instead of >>>>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="} >>>>> >>>>> Nothing wrong with base64 encoding. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Xavier Leong <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into creating a ListIteratorCursor >> to >>>>> use at the remote side, so that it will create the "generic" number >>>>> accessor instead of the ExactNumericAccessor, which I agree, should >> match >>>>> exact. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll also be looking into fixing the ByteString serialized and >>>>> deserialized, it will use JSON getter to convert byte[] to String, and >>>>> BinaryAccessor will reconvert it back to byte[] from String. >>>>>> >>>>>> So that the JSON will now look like "7f000001" instead of >>>>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="} >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Julian Hyde [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 3:25 PM >>>>>> To: dev >>>>>> Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast >>>>> for number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree with your analysis. 1, 2, 3 are all viable options. 1 makes >> the >>>>> payload much larger, 2 would require invasive changes to the JSON >> parser, >>>>> so 3 is my preferred option. I think NumberAccessor does what you need. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the related problem, sending parameter from client to server, I >>>>> think we need to use option 1. The reason is that we don't know what >> the >>>>> parameter type "is supposed to be". The client can set a parameter to >>>>> (Long) 0, which would come across JSON as int 0. So we would need to >> also >>>>> send the type of each parameter value. Luckily, for parameters payload >> size >>>>> is not a concern. >>>>>> >>>>>> Julian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Xavier Leong < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Julian, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moving this to dev thread for wider audience. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The accessor is created using the table column meta from the >> signature, >>>>> which I agree as if we are to reconstruct the data, the right place to >> look >>>>> for the correct type is from the column meta. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The frame rows are serialized as Object, if we to make each result >> item >>>>> to be with strongly typed, then it will be inefficient to retain the >> type >>>>> info in the payload, but if we let the serializer to do the decision, >> some >>>>> type are not translated correctly, eg ByteString use for BINARY type, >> at >>>>> the remote side, it gets constructed as LinkedHashMap from the JSON >>>>> {"bytes":"fwAAAQ=="} string. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, what I see there's 3 way to approach this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) Is to have the payload to be strongly typed with typed-value >>>>>>> representation >>>>>>> 2) Is to reconstruct the data during deserializing based on the >> column >>>>>>> meta >>>>>>> 3) Do conversion in accessor to present the correct data based on >>>>> column meta. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Option 1 will be expensive on the payload, option 2 and 3 is somewhat >>>>> similar, 2 is to do it 1 time with penalty of longer blocking >> response, and >>>>> 3 is to do it lazily when data is access and penalty of repeated >> conversion >>>>> for every get. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Julian Hyde (JIRA) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 6:47 AM >>>>>>> To: Xavier Leong >>>>>>> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-647) Avatica cursor type cast >> for >>>>>>> number cause exception in AvaticaResultSet >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ >>>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-647?page=com.atlassian.j >>>>>>> >> ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=143 >>>>>>> 82864#comment-14382864 ] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-647: >>>>>>> ------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree with your analysis of the cause, but I don't agree with your >>>>> solution. ByteAccessor is an accessor for values that are known to be >> of >>>>> type Byte, so it doesn't need to be fixed; you shouldn't be using it >> for >>>>> JSON data. I think you should be using a different accessor, maybe like >>>>> NumberAccessor, that doesn't make assumptions about the exact type of >> the >>>>> values. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note I added the "boolean json" field to LocalService recently. That >>>>> was for a very similar purpose. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This fix is not complete without a test case. Without one, we will >> very >>>>> easily regress. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think there is a test suite in Avatica that serializes >> requests >>>>> and responses to JSON and back. (It doesn't need to send them over >> HTTP, so >>>>> it can run in a single thread in a single JVM.) That would have >> discovered >>>>> this issue, and probably several similar issues. Maybe you could >> create a >>>>> variant of RemoteDriverTest that does this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you also please check whether this issue exists for parameters? I >>>>> think if you have a long or double parameter and set it to 0, the value >>>>> will arrive at the server as an int. The server needs to be able to >> handle >>>>> that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [~ndimiduk] Can you please review the tests in Avatica, plus >>>>>>> CalciteRemoteDriverTest. If the tests don't have coverage for basic >>>>>>> functionality (all data types, all request/response types, over all >>>>>>> transports) please log jira cases. (Now we have JdbcMeta and the >>>>>>> scott JDBC database, we could consider moving much of >>>>>>> CalciteRemoteDriverTest into Avatica; CalciteRemoteDriverTest would >> be >>>>>>> just a sub-class of that test that uses CalciteMeta rather than >>>>>>> JdbcMeta.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Avatica cursor type cast for number cause exception in >>>>>>>> AvaticaResultSet >>>>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Key: CALCITE-647 >>>>>>>> URL: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-647 >>>>>>>> Project: Calcite >>>>>>>> Issue Type: Bug >>>>>>>> Affects Versions: 1.1.0-incubating >>>>>>>> Reporter: Xavier FH Leong >>>>>>>> Assignee: Julian Hyde >>>>>>>> Labels: avatica >>>>>>>> Attachments: CALCITE-647-cursor-numberTypeCast.patch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After the result are deserialized from JSON on remote side, the >> object >>>>> is not with it's original type, forcing casing of box type Long on >> Integer >>>>> raise exception. >>>>>>>> For all box number, it will type cast to Number and extract using >> the >>>>> Number method instead. >>>>>>>> 2015-03-26 15:49:48,154 [Thread-10] ERROR >>>>>>>> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader - Error reading >>>>>>>> column data, column index = 3 >>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer incompatible with >>>>> java.lang.Long >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> org.apache.calcite.avatica.util.AbstractCursor$LongAccessor.getLong(AbstractCursor.java:483) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaResultSet.getLong(AvaticaResultSet.java:252) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.cellcomponent.DataTypeLong.readResultSet(DataTypeLong.java:365) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.cellcomponent.CellComponentFactory.readResultSet(CellComponentFactory.java:488) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader.doContentTabRead(ResultSetReader.java:613) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.sql.ResultSetReader.readRow(ResultSetReader.java:184) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet.createRow(ResultSetDataSet.java:237) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet._setResultSet(ResultSetDataSet.java:203) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.datasetviewer.ResultSetDataSet.setSqlExecutionTabResultSet(ResultSetDataSet.java:126) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.mainpanel.SQLExecutionHandler.sqlResultSetAvailable(SQLExecutionHandler.java:410) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.processResultSet(SQLExecuterTask.java:542) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.processQuery(SQLExecuterTask.java:407) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.client.session.SQLExecuterTask.run(SQLExecuterTask.java:205) >>>>>>>> at >>>>> >> net.sourceforge.squirrel_sql.fw.util.TaskExecuter.run(TaskExecuter.java:82) >>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:853) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >>>>>>> (v6.3.4#6332) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DISCLAIMER >>>>>>> ========== >>>>>>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which >>>>> is the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the >> use >>>>> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not >> the >>>>> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, >> print, >>>>> distribute or use this message. If you have received this >> communication in >>>>> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. >>>>> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus >> infected >>>>> mails. >>>>>> >>>>>> DISCLAIMER >>>>>> ========== >>>>>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which >> is >>>>> the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the >> use of >>>>> the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the >>>>> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, >> print, >>>>> distribute or use this message. If you have received this >> communication in >>>>> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. >>>>> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus >> infected >>>>> mails. >>> >>> >>> DISCLAIMER >>> ========== >>> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is >> the property of Persistent Systems Ltd. It is intended only for the use of >> the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the >> intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, >> distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in >> error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. >> Persistent Systems Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected >> mails. >>> >>
