+1 for 2.0 only. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1 for doing it in 2.0. > > Basically , Spring will pick the schema from the jars in the class path. > So the change will not effect the camel application if we don't publish > them into the web site. But there are some tools such as Eclipse will > look up the schema from the target name space. > > If we change the target namespace for camel schema , user's old camel > spring configuration file need to be updated. I think we'd better not > touch 1.x branch to keep the consistence. > > BTW, we also need to update the script[1] which copies the maven > snapshots schema into the web site when we change the target namespace > for camel schema. > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/scripts/copy_camel_snapshot_xsd.py > > Willem. > > Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In camel schemas > > targetNamespace="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring"; > > > > The location however is at http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/ (but > > still available at the old activemq location. Do you think it would be > > a good move to change it now to > > targetNamespace="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring"; > > > > I personally think we should do it for 2.0, not so sure about the 1.x > > branch. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Hadrian > > > > -- Cheers, Jon http://janstey.blogspot.com/
