+1 for 2.0. We might as well keep all the old schemas around though - they do no harm being around.
2009/1/24 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>: > +1 on 2.0 only > > I assume we can still publish 1.x schemas to the old activemq location at > Apache > for as Willem said to keep Eclipse and IDEA etc. that can fetch these schemas > into the editor for code completion in the XML. > > When we do the change on 2.0 we must remember there are several spring schema > files in the src folder we need to update (camel-spring, camel-cxf and > maybe some others) > > And should we on 2.0 remove the older schema entries for all the Camel > 1.x releases? > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> @Willem, I am working on a set of camel scripts. >> Thanks >> Hadrian >> >> On Jan 23, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: >> >>> +1 for doing it in 2.0. >>> >>> Basically , Spring will pick the schema from the jars in the class path. >>> So the change will not effect the camel application if we don't publish >>> them into the web site. But there are some tools such as Eclipse will >>> look up the schema from the target name space. >>> >>> If we change the target namespace for camel schema , user's old camel >>> spring configuration file need to be updated. I think we'd better not >>> touch 1.x branch to keep the consistence. >>> >>> BTW, we also need to update the script[1] which copies the maven >>> snapshots schema into the web site when we change the target namespace >>> for camel schema. >>> >>> >>> [1]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/scripts/copy_camel_snapshot_xsd.py >>> >>> Willem. >>> >>> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In camel schemas >>>> targetNamespace="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring"; >>>> >>>> The location however is at http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring/ (but >>>> still available at the old activemq location. Do you think it would be >>>> a good move to change it now to >>>> targetNamespace="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring"; >>>> >>>> I personally think we should do it for 2.0, not so sure about the 1.x >>>> branch. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > Apache Camel Committer > > Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
