2009/7/9 Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>: > Guillaume, you are obviously right, with the comment that it's xml or some > equivalent. Internally to a framework, it could be whatever. Some projects > that use code generation from wsdl to create Exception derived types for > wsdl faults. I am not really an advocate of it, but I would be ok with it, > uh, maybe. Something like (message instanceof CamelFaultException).
Its type could be Document, String or byte[] though. I think a flag is way better. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
