2009/7/9 Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>: > Ah, your proposal is a variation of the first one, where isFault and > setFault() are Message methods, not Exchange. I am fine with that too. Not > sure about the boolean argument for setFault, but that's a detail. Why > would somebody invoke: > message.setFault(false);
Because you cloned a fault message, wanted to preserve the headers, but wanted to clear the fault flag? -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
