okay, I am now reviewing the test case. A document, presenting which DSLs are
supported and which are not, will be commited tomorrow or the day after
tomorrow.
cheers


janstey wrote:
> 
> After trying to grok the intercept code a bit, I'm gonna +1 Claus'
> suggestion :)
> 
> As a side note for any Camel users listening in, the intercept stuff in
> 2.0
> is *much* easier to use than 1.x from a users standpoint - its just
> complex
> under the hood.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jon Anstey<jans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I don't think you should be taking route definitions from one camel
>> context
>> > and loading them into another... I'm surprised this actually works!
>> Also,
>> > I'm not really following why you need a 2nd context to set the id...
>> did
>> you
>> > try just using one?
>> >
>>
>> The "hidden" and advanced stuff such as interceptors / on exception
>> and the likes is not easy to distill back as there is special code in
>> Camel to take core of the routes is assembled correctly according to
>> how big impacts such cross cutting features impose.
>>
>> So I do think the dynamic editor at present time should *not* have
>> such features to express. If we can do it for regular routes with then
>> we got far.
>> In the future we can have a better model that caters for tooling for
>> cross cutting functions such as interceptors.
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:19 AM, xueqiang.mi <allo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I found that the addRouteDefinitions method of camel context caused
>> this
>> >> problem. It seems that this method transform the interceptDefinition
>> into a
>> >> interceptStrategy.
>> >> Before updating a route, I use a temporary camel context to generate
>> the
>> >> route definition from a route builder, so I can obtain the route
>> definition
>> >> and reserve its id. Code is as follows:
>> >> {code}
>> >>       // add the route builder into a temporary camel context
>> >>        CamelContext tempContext = new DefaultCamelContext();
>> >>        tempContext.addRoutes(builder);
>> >>        // get all the added routes and add them into current context
>> >>        List<RouteDefinition> routeDefinitions =
>> >> tempContext.getRouteDefinitions();
>> >>        for (int i = 0; i < routeDefinitions.size(); i++) {
>> >>            RouteDefinition routeDefinition = routeDefinitions.get(i);
>> >>            // set id only for the first route
>> >>            if (i == 0)
>> >>                routeDefinition.setId(id);
>> >>
>> >>            // add or update the route
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> getCamelContext().addRouteDefinitions(Collections.singletonList(routeDefinition));
>> >>        }
>> >> {code}
>> >>
>> >> Then the addRouteDefinitions method is used to add the route
>> definition
>> to
>> >> current camel context and it causes that problem: transforming the
>> >> interceptDefinition into a interceptStrategy. Through test, this
>> operation
>> >> has brought some other similar problems for other DSLs.
>> >>
>> >> Are there any suggestions to solve it?
>> >>
>> >> xueqiang.mi wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > When I tested the intercept DSL, I encountered a problem.
>> >> > I found sometimes the route maintains the intercept definition as a
>> >> output
>> >> > processor in outputs list, but sometimes, it hold the intercept
>> >> > configuration in its interceptStrategies list. I don't what causes
>> the
>> >> > difference and how to differentiate them.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > JIRA j...@apache.org wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> groovy renderer
>> >> >> ---------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>                  Key: CAMEL-1392
>> >> >>                  URL:
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1392
>> >> >>              Project: Apache Camel
>> >> >>           Issue Type: Sub-task
>> >> >>             Reporter: James Strachan
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28CAMEL-1392%29-groovy-renderer-tp22220288p24954096.html
>> >> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > http://janstey.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> Apache Camel Committer
>>
>> Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Jon
> 
> http://janstey.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28CAMEL-1392%29-groovy-renderer-tp22220288p24967020.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to