Thank you very much. This seems to be exactly what we're looking for.
bsnyder wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Dave Wallin <david_wal...@kaltire.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Does anyone know of a JMS Connection Pool implementation that would work >> with SonicMQ. We have found JENKS Connection Pool for ActiveMQ. We >> would >> also be interested in any advice on how to develop a connection pool for >> SonicMQ (which interfaces need to be implemented, etc...) Thanks. > > I suggest using the Spring CachingConnectionFactory: > > http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/jms/connection/CachingConnectionFactory.html > > The CachingConnectionFactory is not tied to any particular MOM and > I've found it to work very well with many different MOMs. It also > provides Session caching and MessageProducer caching as well as > automatic reconnection. The model it uses is to create one connection > per instance of the CachingConnectionFactory and use that single > connection to create many sessions. JMS compliant MOMs work very well > with this model and if you need more than a single physical JMS > connection object, you can just create additional > CachingConnectionFactory instances. Given the features and > flexibility, the widespread deployment and the use of a liberal open > source license of the CachingConnectionFactory, why create yet another > connection factory? > > Bruce > -- > perl -e 'print > unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > );' > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Connection-Pooling-tp25455892p25457526.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.