[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12979791#action_12979791
]
Richard Kettelerij edited comment on CAMEL-3480 at 1/10/11 4:55 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
@Dan.
Out of curiosity: is this component bound to Kestrel? As far as I can see the
component only depends on SpyMemcached, would it make sense to turn it into a
general memcached component (say camel-memcached)? Or does this component
depend on certain Kestrel semantics? Thanks for the contribution btw.
was (Author: rkettelerij):
@Dan.
Out of curiosity: is this component bound to Kestrel? As far as I can see the
component only depends on SpyMemcached, would it make sense to turn it into a
general memcached component (say camel-memcached)? Or does this component
depend on certain Kestrel semantics?
> New component: Kestrel
> ----------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-3480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3480
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Dan Checkoway
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.6.0
>
> Attachments: CAMEL-3480-20110110-full.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> I'm proposing that some adapted open-source code for producing to/consuming
> from Kestrel be added as an official Camel component. Currently the code
> lives here: https://github.com/dcheckoway/camel-kestrel
> Please assign this to me if you'd like me to own this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
