Oh, correction, the interceptors changes came in 2.3.x... /je
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Christian, can we get some sort of commitment from the cxf community that cxf > 2.4.x will be backwards compatible with 2.3.x? I saw that you made the > following change on trunk: > org.apache.cxf.*;version="[2.3.2,2.5)" > > Are there any other dependencies we need to upgrade? > > Hadrian > > On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > >> Yes we need a new camel release to be compatible with cxf 2.4. The question >> is only if we can also do something with the feature file to make it >> compatible with cxf 2.3 and 2.4. >> >> Christian >> >> >> Am 04.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> I guess that the camel-cxf POM should be also updated to update the CXF >>> version range. >>> So we need a new Camel release for that, no ? >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 04/04/2011 04:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>> What do we do with the karaf feature file? >>>> The camel-cxf features are not suitable for cxf 2.4. On the other hand >>>> CXF 2.4 brings it´s own feature file. So if the cxf feature is installed >>>> camel-cxf can just be installed. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:20, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> There are a few dependencies that are used with camel that we don't >>>>> support as mentioned on the SMX mailing list and CAMEL-3830. >>>>> >>>>> I think we should support at least: >>>>> * slf4j 1.6.x >>>>> * jetty 7.3.1.v20110307 >>>>> * cxf 2.4.x >>>>> * (if you know of other dependencies that should be upgraded, please >>>>> comment) >>>>> >>>>> ... and issue a camel-2.7.1 asap. Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Hadrian >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> ---- >> http://www.liquid-reality.de >> >
