I did not have to make code changes to make it compile against cxf 2.4. If got one test error and one test failure. Dan Kulp already looked into these and said that they should be rather problems in the tests than with the
code. We will do more tests as soon as the snapshots are built.

Christian



Am 04.04.2011 16:38, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea:
Christian, can we get some sort of commitment from the cxf community that cxf 
2.4.x will be backwards compatible with 2.3.x? I saw that you made the 
following change on trunk:
org.apache.cxf.*;version="[2.3.2,2.5)"

Are there any other dependencies we need to upgrade?

Hadrian

On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:

Yes we need a new camel release to be compatible with cxf 2.4. The question is 
only if we can also do something with the feature file to make it compatible 
with cxf 2.3 and 2.4.

Christian


Am 04.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
Hi Christian,

I guess that the camel-cxf POM should be also updated to update the CXF version 
range.
So we need a new Camel release for that, no ?

Regards
JB

On 04/04/2011 04:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
What do we do with the karaf feature file?
The camel-cxf features are not suitable for cxf 2.4. On the other hand
CXF 2.4 brings it´s own feature file. So if the cxf feature is installed
camel-cxf can just be installed.

Any ideas?

Christian


Am 04.04.2011 16:20, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea:
Hi,

There are a few dependencies that are used with camel that we don't
support as mentioned on the SMX mailing list and CAMEL-3830.

I think we should support at least:
* slf4j 1.6.x
* jetty 7.3.1.v20110307
* cxf 2.4.x
* (if you know of other dependencies that should be upgraded, please
comment)

... and issue a camel-2.7.1 asap. Thoughts?

Hadrian
--
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de



--
----
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Reply via email to