On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 9:27:31 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 3:21:54 AM Rob Davies wrote: ..... > > I would like to propose that from now on all links to 3rd party > > distributions or usages of Apache Camel in a 3rd party product are put > > into (but not limited to) the following 4 categories: > > > > 1. support > > I think this should be "Commercial Offerings" and the "Support" page would > list the Camel support (mailing lists, jira, etc...) and then have a > paragraph that says something to the affect of "There are also commercial > companies that can provide training and support for camel" that links off > to that page.
See the CXF page for an example: http://cxf.apache.org/support.html > > 4. Tools > > I'm -1 on tools. The Tools page should just describe the tools that > Camel provides, if any. Beyond that, another link ("There are commercial > tooling provided by companies...") to the above commercial offerings page. Actually, this same idea can expand out to things like docs and such. For example, the CXF docs page: http://cxf.apache.org/docs/index.html has an "Other Sources of Documentation and Information" section that links to the commercial page. Likewise in the FAQ: http://cxf.apache.org/faq.html Thus, if there are other areas on the site that could potential link to commercial things, they could link to that page in a similar fassion. Dan > > Dan > > > And there is a grace period (till end of June 2011) to move links to > > external information to one of these areas by the authors, else it they > > will be deleted. > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > On 3 May 2011, at 16:52, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > > No, there are things that are not up to the community to decide. I drew > > > attention when some changes were made that that was a mistake and my > > > impression was that the point was well taken. I also mentioned that if > > > changes won't be removed by their authors I will. That was months ago. > > > If anything, I can be blamed for not making these changes earlier. > > > > > > The Apache Camel project has a designated place to inform the users > > > community of commercial offerings [1]. And there are also the articles > > > [2] and tutorials [3] pages that can be used (within reason). > > > Everything else a commercial organization has to say about offerings > > > related to the Apache projects can be done on their site. > > > > > > I hope this clarifies it, > > > Hadrian > > > > > > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Support > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Articles > > > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Tutorials > > > > > > On May 3, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > > >> Hi > > >> > > >> This post is addressed to Hadrian who has been deleting and editing > > >> web pages from Apache Camel (today), > > >> which seems to be related to the fact those pages had information > > >> about Fuse. > > >> > > >> I would like to call out that such actions should have been discussed > > >> in the public at first and agreed upon by the community. > > >> > > >> Most of the information has been there for a long time and its related > > >> and relevant for Apache Camel. > > >> And of use for people who look into what Camel is. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
