On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am currently looking into the dependencies betwen packages in camel-core. > The packages org.apache.camel and org.apache.camel.spi form the camel api. > So I am trying to make them not depend on other packages from camel-core. > One problem there is the starter class Main. > > It needs access to impl packages as it needs to start camel. So it should > not live in org.apache.camel. > > I propose to move it to org.apache.camel.main. To not break anything right > now I will create a deprecated class Main in org.apache.camel. We can remove > the deprecated version in camel 3.0 > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4357 >
I wonder if the impl package had been named core instead, if that would make the tangles more tolerable? As depending on core for me always seems okay :) Anyway we have ServiceSupport in impl which IMHO should have been in util. That would have been nice as its a good base class to extend if your class need to be a Camel Service. I wonder if an experiment by moving it from impl to util will reduce some tangles. > Christian > > > -- > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com > > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
