Hi Claus,
I think you are right. These classes can be put into util. As they are
only two classes I suggest to directly put them in util.
Originally I put them ino the API package as they are needed in
camel-jms and so are needed in at least some components. We now agreed
that support may access util so util is part of the "extended" API of
API+SPI+support+util.
I am still not sure if we should have data classes in util but I also
have no better suggestion so util is ok for me.
Christian
Am 30.08.2011 08:50, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
Hi
Its a pita that these classes is moved to the root package of Camel.
The root package is an API having only interfaces, exceptions, enums,
annotations etc. Then we got those two "stranded whales" here which
seems misplaced.
The JDK have its xxxSource implementations in sub packages:
javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamSource
So why can't we in Camel? It seems too dramatic as a solution to move
stuff into the root package.
Also these classes do *not* implement any Camel interface, but they
are JDK xxxSource specific helpers in Camel.
Instead I suggest they are placed in the org.apache.camel.util.stream package
--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
