Hi Claus, On 25 January 2012 11:08, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Currently we have a maven archetype named: camel-archetype-java > Its however a Spring XML project with a Java RouteBuilder (eg Java DSL). > I liked the idea to have a standalone archetype without any spring
> I would like to propose that we: > > a) > Rename camel-archetype-java to camel-archetype-spring-java what will the difference between camel-archetype-spring-java and existing camel-archetype-spring > > b) > Create a new camel-archetype-standalone which is a pure Java > standalone with a Java RouteBuilder > and a Java Main app to start the Camel app from standalone. It is fine for me, just not sure about the name. Aren't there also other archetypes (for example scala) which are standalone?Why not only camel-archetype-java my 2c Bilgin > > > This may help out of the box experience with Camel as we got an > archetype for a standalone Camel app. > Also since Camel is not runtime tied to Spring anymore, we should > rename that archetype to spring-java, to indicate > its a Spring project with Camel Java DSL. > > > Any thoughts? > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > FuseSource > Email: cib...@fusesource.com > Web: http://fusesource.com > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
