Am 25.01.2012 14:15, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Christian Schneider
<ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
Am 25.01.2012 12:08, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
Hi
Currently we have a maven archetype named: camel-archetype-java
Its however a Spring XML project with a Java RouteBuilder (eg Java DSL).
I would like to propose that we:
a)
Rename camel-archetype-java to camel-archetype-spring-java
b)
Create a new camel-archetype-standalone which is a pure Java
standalone with a Java RouteBuilder
and a Java Main app to start the Camel app from standalone.
I would rather name it camel-archetype-standalone-java or
camel-archetype-java-standalone.
Yeah or may as Bilgin suggest, we could just keep camel-archetype-java
as the pure Java archetype.
Its kinda indicated by its name.
btw the difference between camel-archetype-spring-java and
camel-archetype-spring, would be that the both use Spring XML, but the
former has a Camel route in Java DSL, and the latter a Camel route in
XML DSL.
I would not create two archetypes for that. If you define the camel
context in spring it is trivial to add routes to it.
So I would have a Java Routebuilder in the spring archetype and people
who do not want it can simple delete it. Having two archetypes
will rather confuse people.
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
