Babak, per the ASF policy we can release 2.12.3 even with -1s.
However, I usually shoot for consensus. Here's what I am going to do in
this case, because yours is the only -1 with an overwhelming majority of
+1s. I'll give it another 12 hours and if nothing changes I will close
the vote and release 2.12.3. If within this time you convince another
PMC member to change his vote I will cancel this vote.
We had two releases in the past, years ago (1.4 and 1.5 time) that were
built with a newer version that the oldest supported and we got burned
by the version of the class file format. (I was the one who messed up,
had to redo the releases and learned my lesson). I personally don't
release with a newer java version than the oldest supported.
Cheers,
Hadrian
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
On 02/19/2014 10:19 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
Hi Harian,
I'm actually still -1 to this release candidate as the HTML documentation
inside the bundles are missing (as a side effect of Java 6 being used for
building instead of Java 7). This requirement has been clearly stated inside
our release guides (yes, I was the one who added that note):
http://camel.apache.org/release-guide.html
And we've also discussed this many times @ the dev-forum as well:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/improving-Endpoint-documentation-and-tooling-td5731334.html
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Our-builds-looks-really-bad-tp5731673p5731743.html
That all said, I may sound too pedantic, sorry for that!
Last but not least I ask for apologies by the Apache Camel PMC because of
the STUPID mistake I made while voting for the 2.11.4 release candidate:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-4-tp5747362p5747430.html
As I had A LOT OF BEERS the night before that vote of mine. So I guess that
was why my brain went terribly wrong :)
Many thanks for your effort to prepare these two release candidates!
Babak
hadrian wrote
Babak,
We're past the 72 hours mark and I would like to close this vote with a
consensus is possible. Do you still think we have an issue, or you want
to consider reverting your vote?
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 02/17/2014 05:06 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
Hi Willem,
can you please elaborate your explanation a bit? Currently what we've on
the
2.12.x. as well as 2.11.x branches is this:
<cxf-version>
2.7.10
</cxf-version>
<cxf-version-range>
[2.6,2.9)
</cxf-version-range>
Now to my understanding this should become:
<cxf-version>
2.7.10
</cxf-version>
<cxf-version-range>
[2.6,3)
</cxf-version-range>
I think the current range is a problem for the OSGi folks because if e.g.
there's a bug-fix being provided in CXF 2.7.10, currently they can't
force
the Container to make use of CXF 2.7.10 while they install the
"camel-cxf"
feature version 2.12.3 or 2.11.4 (e.g. in the context of a dependency of
their own Karaf feature "my-cool-app-karaf-feature") because the current
range does NOT include 2.7.10.
Babak
Willem.Jiang wrote
There are some patches of supporting CXF 3.x are not merged to
camel-2.12.x and camel-2.11.x.
So the cxf version rang of camel-2.12.x and camel-2.11.x is right.
I don’t think it’s a show-stopper.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On February 16, 2014 at 11:35:56 PM, Babak Vahdat (
babak.vahdat@
) wrote:
O.K. the build has been definetly done using Java 6 as this's how
MANIFEST.MF
of camel-core-2.12.3.jar looks like:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Bnd-LastModified: 1392475192207
Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_45
Built-By: hadrian
...
Other than that the backport of the fix for CAMEL-7170 did NOT
adjust the
maven property accordingly, so on the
master branch
we've got:
2.7.10
[2.6,4.0)
Which is fine, however on the 2.12.x as well as the 2.11.x branch
we've got:
2.7.10
[2.6,2.9)
So here's my -1
Babak
Babak Vahdat wrote
Hi
The HTML component documentation inside the JARs are missing.
I assume
Java 6 has been used for building this release candidate. See
also the
first "Note" @ http://camel.apache.org/release-guide.html
Babak
hadrian wrote
This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch release
coming
with about 128 issues fixed.
Release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002
Tarballs:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/
Tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6
Please test this release candidate and cast your vote.
[ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3
[ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
Vote is open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Hadrian
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747375.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747421.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747563.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
