Hi Pascal,

OK, I will try to send a PR for it this weekend.



Willem Jiang

Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
          http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:09 AM, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
wrote:

> Hi Willem,
>
> thanks for the info. :)
>
> I'm not an OSGi user, so I'm not qualified to comment on this.
>
> Do you plan to (or maybe you already did) create a Freemarker issue for
> this?
>
> -Pascal
>
>
> Am 02.05.2018 um 04:30 schrieb Willem Jiang:
>
>> It's not a good practices to use the dynamic import *[1] to workaround the
>> package import issue, as we use the OSGi bundle as the old jar.
>> We may need to work with Freemarker to build a right OSGi bundle for it.
>>
>> [1]https://github.com/apache/freemarker/blob/2.3-gae/osgi.bnd#L50
>>
>>
>> Willem Jiang
>>
>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>>            http://jnn.iteye.com  (Chinese)
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Pascal Schumacher <
>> pascalschumac...@gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Zoran,
>>>
>>> thanks for the feedback.
>>>
>>> Implemented in: https://github.com/apache/came
>>> l/commit/6217ba02eb8fab1bea2a7252aa00a1d659c0ea3e
>>>
>>> - Pascal
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 30.04.2018 um 19:53 schrieb Zoran Regvart:
>>>
>>> Hi Pascal,
>>>> I think you're spot on, I think we should use the freemarker as is and
>>>> remove the service mix one,
>>>>
>>>> zoran
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Pascal Schumacher
>>>> <pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> while looking into updating the freemarker version used by camel I
>>>>> noticed
>>>>> that we have both freemarker-version and freemarker-bundle-version.
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like freemarker already is a OSGI bundle nowadays:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/freemarker/blob/2.3-gae/build.xml#L412
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/freemarker/blob/2.3-gae/osgi.bnd
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we still need the freemarker service mix bundle?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pascal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to