Hi David,
thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate it!

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:25 PM David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t quite understand why, how, or where you are setting up symlinks for 
> the components.  Is there some reason not to put the expected antora 
> directory structure inside each  components expected maven directory 
> structure and assemble them using antora?
>
> e.g.
>
> camel-*/src/main/doc/modules/component/pages/*.adoc

Yeah I've thought about it, that moves the complexity from having a
single module with ~400 pages of component documentation to having
~400 individual modules. We could evaluate that approach but on first
hand it seems even more complicated with little to gain.

> I haven’t set up anything nearly this complicated with antora so I could 
> easily be missing something obvious :-)

Neither have I, so keep the feedback coming, I could be missing a lot
of details here :)

> If this doesn’t work I’d be tempted to try to patch antora to work with maven 
> directory structure, do you know if this is impractical?

I'm not sure that's the way we'd like to go -- it would make us
maintainers of a fork, doing symlinks looks like a pragmatic approach
to me. It's not that much to maintain I think[1].

zoran

[1] 
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/e5523701ca10458cc21f82bc0933f97009f8438f/docs/gulpfile.js#L8-L19
-- 
Zoran Regvart

Reply via email to