Anything that starts with org.apache.xxx should be released by the corresponding Apache project. If that's not the case for Camel, we should ask the other projects to change their groupId to something not starting with org.apache.camel.
Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 12:24, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi > > Well then we have camel-spring-boot itself, its not a starter should > it then also have that group id or not? > Today with org.apache.camel, then we know all of that is the official > Apache Camel. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:08 PM Zoran Regvart <zo...@regvart.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Cameleers, > > we publish Spring Boot starters with the Maven group ID of > > `org.apache.camel`, I think it would be better if we publish them with > > another group ID, something like `org.apache.camel.spring.boot`. > > > > My reasoning is that with time there might be other kinds of starters, > > even within the Spring ecosystem, we might event add some versioning > > information in the group ID, like `org.apache.camel.spring.boot2`, > > this might open the doors for supporting multiple (possibly mutually > > exclusive) versions of Spring Boot. > > > > What do you think? > > > > zoran > > -- > > Zoran Regvart > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet
