+1 On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 4:33 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah sorry, for the misunderstanding, yeah we're saying the same thing. > > Il giorno mer 12 giu 2019 alle ore 16:32 Guillaume Nodet < > gno...@apache.org> > ha scritto: > > > I was referring to the "Today with org.apache.camel, then we know all of > > that is the official Apache Camel." sentence which implies that if the > > groupId isn't org.apache.camel, it may not be official. I slightly > > disagree, as I think anything that *starts with* org.apache.camel is > > supposed to be official so that would cover org.apache.camel.spring.boot > or > > anything similar. > > > > Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 16:11, Andrea Cosentino > > <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid> a écrit : > > > > > It's just a different package naming.. It's > org.apache.camel.spring.boot > > > > > > -- > > > Andrea Cosentino > > > ---------------------------------- > > > Apache Camel PMC Chair > > > Apache Karaf Committer > > > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > > > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > > > Twitter: @oscerd2 > > > Github: oscerd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 4:02:25 PM GMT+2, Guillaume Nodet < > > > gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anything that starts with org.apache.xxx should be released by the > > > corresponding Apache project. > > > If that's not the case for Camel, we should ask the other projects to > > > change their groupId to something not starting with org.apache.camel. > > > > > > Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 12:24, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a > > écrit > > > : > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Well then we have camel-spring-boot itself, its not a starter should > > > > it then also have that group id or not? > > > > Today with org.apache.camel, then we know all of that is the official > > > > Apache Camel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:08 PM Zoran Regvart <zo...@regvart.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Cameleers, > > > > > we publish Spring Boot starters with the Maven group ID of > > > > > `org.apache.camel`, I think it would be better if we publish them > > with > > > > > another group ID, something like `org.apache.camel.spring.boot`. > > > > > > > > > > My reasoning is that with time there might be other kinds of > > starters, > > > > > even within the Spring ecosystem, we might event add some > versioning > > > > > information in the group ID, like `org.apache.camel.spring.boot2`, > > > > > this might open the doors for supporting multiple (possibly > mutually > > > > > exclusive) versions of Spring Boot. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > zoran > > > > > -- > > > > > Zoran Regvart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Claus Ibsen > > > > ----------------- > > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------ > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------ > > Guillaume Nodet > > >
