On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:53 AM Andrea Tarocchi <andrea.taroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry to resume this old-ish conversation, > > do you still see value in having LGTM running on each PR? > it takes A LOT of time and it seems reports are seldom taken into account > in regards to merging/not merging a PR. > On top of that is seems there are 300 error/warning in the findings not > addressed... > > Wouldn't it be better to disable it and just run it on a one-off basis? >
+1 > Regards, > Andrea. > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:32 PM Omar Al-Safi <o...@oalsafi.com> wrote: > > > I have already addressed most of the errors reported and some of the > > warnings, I will wait for the next report to be generated and look if we > > still need to fix. > > I am going to ask INFRA to enable it and test it and see its scope since I > > have no idea about but when I was looking at > > https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/incubator-druid/ci/, it looks it only > > checks the PR content which is a good thing for us. > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:45 PM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Le mer. 18 déc. 2019 à 09:15, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a > > écrit > > > : > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:17 PM Omar Al-Safi <oals...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > > > > Recently, I stumbled across this code analysis tool > > https://lgtm.com/ > > > > and > > > > > is free for open source integration. It looks pretty good based on > > the > > > > > analysis results it gave for camel ( > > > > > https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/camel/) (sure some of them it can > > > be > > > > > neglected). However, I was wondering, does it make sense to enable it > > > on > > > > > PRs? For me personally, it could help to some extent to catch > > potential > > > > > bugs that hard to spot by the human eye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > For PRs then can it be limited to only the code from the PR? > > > > The Camel code base is still massive and I dont want to have some slow > > > > process for PRs > > > > > > > > > > Right, if that's limited to the code modified by the PR, that could be a > > > good thing to add the check. > > > Else, we'd have to wait until the current problems are actually solved > > > before enabling it on PRs. > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > > > > > > > Instead of the tool just runs a general report once a week/month etc > > > > then we can take a look at it from time to time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Omar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Claus Ibsen > > > > ----------------- > > > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ------------------------ > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > > > > -- > "In a world without walls and fences who needs Windows and Gates?" > <https://about.me/andrea.tarocchi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=edit_panel&utm_content=thumb> > Andrea Tarocchi > about.me/andrea.tarocchi > <https://about.me/andrea.tarocchi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=edit_panel&utm_content=thumb> -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
