+1, we could also add this information on the website and a column with lts true/false on the releases page.
Il giorno ven 28 feb 2020 alle ore 07:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofre < j...@nanthrax.net> ha scritto: > Hi, > > I agree, it makes sense to me. I think that more than fast, we should have > a "regular pace" in term of releases (even if the releases don’t contain > much). > > Regards > JB > > > Le 28 févr. 2020 à 07:39, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Hi > > > > We have released Camel 3.0 and 3.1 yesterday. As Camel v3 is a major > > new foundation with all the effort that went into it, then we want to > > take the new few releases to continue as there are things we need to > > work on. > > > > Therefore we want to have a more aggressive release schedule and > > release more frequent releases but they are not LTS releases (long > > term support). Therefore these releases likely only have 1 patch > > releases, eg 3.0.1, or none at all. > > > > When we hit Camel 3.3 then its expected to be a LTS release and have > > patch releases for a longer period of time. > > > > And in fact this model is maybe something we want to continue > > thereafter and be able to mark releases as LTS and non LTS. Eg just > > like the JDK etc. > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > >
