+1. I say go for it.
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:27, Peter Schuller <peter.schul...@infidyne.com> wrote: > Without weighing in on the remainder of the discussion; regardless of > what happens what do people think about at least making some minor > structural changes to e.g. the wiki? For example, putting the Thrift > API in a section other than the "user documentation", and being pretty > vocal (to the point of sounding repetitious) about recommending that > applications use the higher level clients? > > I think it's pretty easy to "accidentally" land in the Thrift > documentation if you browse around. > > I'd be happy to try to tweak this a bit. Stuff like moving the thrift > refs, and trying to find places on the wiki that links to the thrift > API page and re-consider whether (or at least how) to link, etc. > > -- > / Peter Schuller >
