On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > I'd rather drop the leading the 0 and continue to number releases > sequentially the way we have. If our < 1 versioning is signaling a lack > of readiness, and if >= 1 is a necessary gate, then 8.0 should work > equally as well. Better in fact, 8 times better!
+1 for semantic versioning <http://semver.org/>. It may not be perfect (whatever that means) but at least it has a common, [well] defined meaning. As for `due diligence`, that's a fine codename for the next release. :)
