I'd love to see the community adopt it as a starting point for working towards whatever level of functionality is desired.
>From what I understand second-hand from talking to people on the SIG calls, there was a general inability to agree on an existing operator as a starting point and not much engagement on taking best of breed from the various to combine them. Seems to leave us in the "let a thousand flowers bloom" stage of letting operators grow in the ecosystem and seeing which ones meet the needs of end users before talking about adopting one into the foundation. Great to hear that you folks are joining forces though! Bodes well for C* users that are wanting to run things on k8s. On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:26 AM, Ben Bromhead <b...@instaclustr.com> wrote: > For what it's worth, a quick update from me: > > CassKop now has at least two organisations working on it substantially > (Orange and Instaclustr) as well as the numerous other contributors. > > Internally we will also start pointing others towards CasKop once a few > things get merged. While we are not yet sunsetting our operator yet, it is > certainly looking that way. > > I'd love to see the community adopt it as a starting point for working > towards whatever level of functionality is desired. > > Cheers > > Ben > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:37 PM John Sanda <john.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> > wrote: > > There's basically 1 java driver in the C* ecosystem. We have 3? 4? or > > more > > operators in the ecosystem. Has one of them hit a clear supermajority of > adoption that makes it the de facto default and makes sense to pull it > > into > > the project? > > We as a project community were pretty slow to move on building a PoV > > around > > kubernetes so we find ourselves in a situation with a bunch of contenders > for inclusion in the project. It's not clear to me what heuristics we'd > > use > > to gauge which one would be the best fit for inclusion outside letting > community adoption speak. > > --- > Josh McKenzie > > We actually talked a good bit on the SIG call earlier today about > heuristics. We need to document what functionality an operator should > include at level 0, level 1, etc. We did discuss this a good bit during > some of the initial SIG meetings, but I guess it wasn't really a focal > point at the time. I think we should also provide references to existing > operator projects and possibly other related projects. This would benefit > both community users as well as people working on these projects. > > - John > > -- > > Ben Bromhead > > Instaclustr | www.instaclustr.com | @instaclustr > <http://twitter.com/instaclustr> | (650) 284 9692 >
