> I guess you are asking for something official from VP Legal Affairs or the > ASF board? If so I can make that happen.
I would prefer the official policy pages to be updated to have a clear statement on this, so this problem can be solved in perpetuity. > IMO it does, the project can choose to ignore that if they want. I suggest > you read what Roy wrote on this subject I have read all of the above, and none of these rise to official statements of policy that clearly accord with your view. I'm not ignoring anything, surely you can at least agree that official statements on this are unclear? > Saying we all volunteers, while true, doesn't remove the responsibility the > PMC has to make sure its releases are open source / comply with ASF policy. The PMC has acted in good faith in this matter, and has followed the official policy documents as it interprets them. How else is the PMC meant to discern ASF policy? I am happy to accept there has been a failure to communicate the intended policy, but asking the PMC to bear a significant cost correcting actions taken in good faith on reasonable readings of the policy documents would not in my opinion be reasonable. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
