72 hours has passed. With some tweaking and Joey's amendment, we have 12
binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1.

I've updated the wiki to reflect that this process is now ratified:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+CI+Process

Thanks everyone!

~Josh

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:18 AM Sam Tunnicliffe <s...@beobal.com> wrote:

> +1 with/without amendment
>
> > On 13 Jan 2022, at 05:26, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh I completely agree with you. I was just trying to explain that
> > getting to 2/3 failures is a realistic target.
> >
> > +1 also on the amendment.
> >
> > On 12/1/22 17:39, Joseph Lynch wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 3:25 AM Berenguer Blasi
> >> <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> jenkins CI was at 2/3 flakies consistently post 4.0 release.
> >> That is really impressive and I absolutely don't mean to downplay that
> >> achievement.
> >>
> >>> Then things broke and we've been working hard to get back to the 2/3
> flakies. Most
> >>> current failures imo are timeuuid C17133 or early termination of
> process
> >>> C17140 related afaik. So getting back to the 2/3 'impossible' flakies
> >>> should be doable and a reasonable target (famous last words...). My
> 2cts.
> >> I really appreciate all the work folks have been doing to get the
> >> project to green, and I support the parts of the proposal that try to
> >> formalize methods to try to keep us there. I am only objecting to #2
> >> in the proposal where we have a non-negotiable gate on tests before a
> >> release.
> >>
> >> -Joey
> >> .
>
>

Reply via email to