Nothing promotable like a shiny new release tag! On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:50 AM C. Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net> wrote:
> Yep, supportive of anything that has the potential to increase the number > of users evaluating a pre-release build. Alpha sounds great. > > On May 18, 2022, at 9:29 AM, David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com> wrote: > > > Works for me > > On May 18, 2022, at 7:36 AM, Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 from me on the grounds that I expect users to be more inclined to test > an alpha build of 4.1 rather than finding and pulling down a nightly. > Expectations of stability differ. > > On Wed, May 18, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Stefan Miklosovic wrote: > > Hi Mick, > > I do not mind having alpha1 out. It will help me with setting up all > build pipelines for our plugins / tools / libraries as now I can not > build it as snapshot is not released anywhere nor I can depend on it > in Maven projects, for example. > > So yeah, +1 from me. > > Regards > > On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 11:40, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Our release lifecycle docs¹ imply that we can release alphas despite > > flaky test failures, which means we can cut and vote on a 4.1-alpha1 > > release today. This is also on the presumption that point (2) on our > > Cassandra CI Process docs² does not apply to pre-beta releases. > > > > Is there an appetite for this? > > Any objections? > > Any tickets about to land folk want us to wait on? > > > > regards, > > Mick > > > > > > 1) > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Release+Lifecycle > > > > 2) > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Cassandra+CI+Process > > >
