Could you be more explicit? Are you saying we should release 5.0 instead of 4.2 (which I'm assuming you're advocating for), or are you saying we should release 4.2?
I still do not understand the question, really. It can't be more important to be consistent with versioning than for versions to mean what we want them to communicate, but we can do well on both fronts without much additional effort. On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > >> I'm also a bit confused by the original question: if there's a proposal to >> release 4.2 as 5.0, let's hear out why and just vote for it (list reasons, >> and let everyone express their opinions about why this does or does not >> warrant the version bump). If there are no reasons for us to do, I'm not >> sure why this is important. > > > Consistency. To the benefit of operators. > > I totally get from our PoV there's no problem with this being arbitrary. But > from experience witnessing the uncertainty and pain operators go through, > this "decide it each time" is not simplifying it for anyone. >
