Accord doesn’t have a hard dependency on CEP-21 fwiw, it just needs linearizable epochs. This could be achieved with a much more modest patch, essentially avoiding almost all of the insertion points of cep-21, just making sure that joining and leaving nodes update some state via Paxos instead of via gossip, and assign an epoch as part of the update. It would be preferable to use cep-21 since it introduces this functionality, and our intention is to use cep-21 for this. But it isn’t a hard dependency. On 22 Mar 2023, at 20:58, Henrik Ingo <henrik.i...@datastax.com> wrote:
|
- [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-tcm, and trunk Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-tcm, and trunk Henrik Ingo
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-tcm, and trun... Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-tcm, and ... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-tcm, ... Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep-21-... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep... Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord, cep... David Capwell
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord,... Josh McKenzie
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord,... David Capwell
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord,... Benedict
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord,... Caleb Rackliffe
- Re: [DISCUSS] cep-15-accord,... Henrik Ingo