I checked and I’m pretty sure we do, but it doesn’t apply any liveness optimisation. I had misunderstood the optimisation you proposed. Ideally we would encode any non-live timestamp with the delta offset, but since that’s a distinct optimisation perhaps that can be left to another patch. Are we happy, though, that the two different deletion time serialisers can store different ranges of timestamp? Both are large ranges, but I am not 100% comfortable with them diverging. On 3 Jul 2023, at 05:45, Berenguer Blasi <berenguerbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
|
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Benedict
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Josh McKenzie
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Benedict
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Mick Semb Wever
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Josh McKenzie
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Benedict
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Benedict
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Brandon Williams
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce disk si... Jeff Jirsa
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Brandon Williams
- Re: Improved DeletionTime serialization to reduce di... Berenguer Blasi