+1 to drop if we're not using.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, at 6:58 PM, Ekaterina Dimitrova wrote: > +1 on removal the whole lib if we are sure we don’t need it. Nothing better > than some healthy house cleaning > > -1 on partial removals > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:34, David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com> wrote: >> +1 to drop the whole lib… >> >> >>> On Oct 20, 2023, at 7:55 AM, Jeremiah Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Agreed. -1 on selectively removing any of the libs. But +1 for removing >>> the whole thing if it is no longer used. >>> >>> -Jeremiah >>> >>> On Oct 20, 2023 at 9:28:55 AM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> Does anyone see any reason _not_ to do this? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for bring this to dev@ >>>> >>>> I see reason not to do it, folk do submit patches for other archs despite >>>> us not formally maintaining and testing the code for those archs. Some >>>> examples are PPC64 Big Endian (CASSANDRA-7476), s390x (CASSANDRA-17723), >>>> PPC64 Little Endian (CASSANDRA-7381), sparcv9 (CASSANDRA-6628). Wrote >>>> this on the ticket too. >>>> >>>> +1 for removing sigar altogether (as Brandon points out).
