If we are going to commit to beta2 before the summit because "putting a beta w/ SAI in this state into users’ hands at summit would be very, very bad" I don't see why we need to have a subpar beta1 at all?
Kind Regards, Brandon On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 11:16 AM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 18:06, Caleb Rackliffe <calebrackli...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Just to update this thread, Mike has identified the root cause of 19011 and >> in the process uncovered 2 additional very closely related issues. >> (Fantastic job fuzzing there!) Fixes for all three issues are in hand, and >> he continues to test. >> >> After some conversation w/ Mick, Alex, and Mike, I feel like cutting a beta1 >> now is fine as long as we commit to a beta2 before summit that includes >> 19011. Putting a beta w/ SAI in this state into users’ hands at summit would >> be very, very bad. > > > > In case this sounds weird, to clarify: this is a mitigation action – there's > a risk with every release that it does not make it through. beta1 might not > be great for SAI, but getting it out is better than having only alpha1 > available come Summit. It might feel odd to have a beta2 right after a > beta1, but I don't mind (and would rather) take the time and investment. > > beta1 would be announced with an appropriate disclaimer. > >
